China likes to call Taiwan "Chinese Taipei." China could call itself "Taiwanese Beijing." This name may sound strange, but is fully justifiable. Taiwanese investments have made a major contribution to China's economy and military power -- including the missiles aimed at Taiwan. In addition, China used to be ruled by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). China imposes the name "Chinese Taipei" on Taiwan possibly because Taiwan was once ruled by China. If so, Taiwan should also be called "Portuguese Formosa," "Dutch Tailam" and "Japanese Taihoku." China itself could also be called "Russian China," "Japanese Manchuria" and "KMT Nanking." Furthermore, Australia and the US should be called "British Canberra" and "British Washington," respectively.
Whenever reporters come across the name "Chinese Taipei," they have to explain that this refers to Taiwan. If a 6-letter name can describe a country, why do we need a 13-letter name that causes confusion?
When Little League baseball games were played in Pennsylvania last month, the televised games showed that the young players were from "Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipei" as if they had been from twin cities. Some Taiwanese team supporters even shouted "Chinese team, go, go, go!" Which side were they on? There will be more confusion when Taiwan meets China in the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Let's use "Taiwan" for Taiwan.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s