I have always had a particular loathing of the one-party state -- especially the Leninist sort, which is totally antithetical to the principals of democratic government. The Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) both started life as Leninist-style political parties, and when the KMT retreated to Taiwan in 1949, it continued to follow this political model.
During the run-up to the 2000 presidential election, Chen Shui-bian (
I completely opposed this, and warned the DPP that it was in danger of becoming a Leninist party. No notice was taken of my warnings. But now, after winning a second term, Chen has proposed stepping down as party chairman.
At the third anniversary of the founding of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), Chen departed from his prepared speech and said that he hoped the legislative speaker could be a person who served the whole people, rather than serving a political party. He said he hoped the future speaker would not participate in party affairs and would not be a member of a central standing committee or the central executive committee, or serve as vice chairman or chairman.
If the DPP win a majority in the year-end legislative elections then the Cabinet and legislature will be able to operate more normally. In this situation, if the speaker is able to rise above party politics and serve as an impartial official of the legislature, this will be a great blessing for the nation's people.
What Chen said is fully in accord with the principles of democracy. But for Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) there was criticism hidden between the lines. Wang responded by asking about Chen's own situation, since the president is also the chairman of the DPP.
KMT caucus whip Huang Teh-fu (
I have seldom agreed with these KMT heavyweights. But in this case the criticism they have leveled at Chen is deserved. Only by first stepping down as DPP chairman can Chen with a clear conscience demand that the legislative speaker renounce party office. If the country adopts a presidential system, then the political parties should be reduced to being election machines -- as in the US model -- with the president, speaker and other government officials such as the premier, ministers and even legislators all barred from holding concurrent party office.
Chen must establish a separation of party and state by first stepping down as DPP chairman and becoming a president for the whole people before he can demand that Wang step down from his position as KMT vice-chairman. The same goes for DPP Secretary-General Chang Chun-hsiung (
Whether this model of democratic practice is written into the law, or even incorporated into the Constitution, should be carefully considered. But separation of party and state is crucial to the development of constitutional government.
Chiou Chwei-liang is currently a visiting professor at Tamkang University.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with