China's national soccer team lost by a score of 3 to 1 to the Japanese team in the Asian Cup final in Beijing on Aug. 7. For the increasing number of ultra-nationalistic Chinese, losing the championship at home to the hated Japanese was simply unbearable.
During the game, Chinese fans shouted -- among other insulting chants -- "Kill! Kill! Kill!" After the game, they burned Japanese flags, pelted the Japanese team bus with bottles, and pounded a limousine carrying a Japanese embassy official.
The bitter collective memory of Japan's invasion of China and the brutality of its soldiers during the war certainly has contributed to a prolonged anti-Japanese sentiment over the years. The unwillingness of the Japanese government to "sincerely apologize" for the wrong the Japanese did to China has not helped either.
For its own political purposes, Beijing has also helped to encourage anti-foreign sentiment in recent years. Now that China is rising as a major military and economic power, the nationalistic Chinese appear to feel justified in expressing a high level of pride and emotion. They have come to denigrate their major Asian rival as "little Japan."
Chinese ultra-nationalists show no sign of ending their anti-foreign sentiment. In addition to venting their anger against Team Japan, the Chinese fans showed their lack of sportsmanship by jeering other teams that Team China faced throughout the Asian Cup tournament. If not managed properly, the situation will get worse when time comes for the 2008 summer Olympics to open in Beijing.
For China, the stakes will be high indeed. The Chinese government will without doubt continue to prepare Chinese athletes to win as many medals as possible. According to a newspaper report, there are about 4,000 state-sponsored sports schools training young Chinese to compete for the 2008 games and 17,000 are currently in this Chinese elite athlete training system. Beijing is clearly determined to make China a sports superpower rivaling the US and Russia.
The Chinese sports fans' expectations for medals will be sky-high. It is therefore not difficult to predict how the nationalistic Chinese will behave in Beijing in the summer of 2008 when their athletes come up against those of other countries, particularly those that the Chinese believe have wronged their country in the past.
They do not forget their so-called "century of humiliation," when China suffered at the hands of the intruding foreign powers from the mid-19th to the mid-20th centuries.
Molded by their government's nationalist education and propaganda, the Chinese firmly believe that Russia stole much of Siberia from Manchu China in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, that England cheated Manchu China economically and wrested Hong Kong from it after defeating the declining Manchu dynasty in the "Opium War" of late 1830s, and that France joined England in attacking North China in late 1850s.
Japan forced the Manchu dynasty to cede Taiwan after dealing Manchu China a humiliating military defeat in 1895 and that the US joined seven other countries, including those named above as well as Germany, Italy and Austria-Hungary in invading Beijing in 1900 during the so-called "Boxer Rebellion."
To the ultra-nationalistic Chinese who blame their country's ills and weaknesses on others, the list of offending nations is long. And the time will come for China to get even with each and every culprit. However, the US will doubtlessly be the biggest target of irrational Chinese sports fans' ire in the 2008 Olympic Summer Game in Beijing -- for its role in the Korean War, its failure to recognize China until 1979, its arms sales to Taiwan and alleged support for Taiwan's "creeping independence" and its continuing efforts to "contain" China.
After the Asian Cup final, many international authorities, sports and otherwise, have expressed concern that the ugly and immature behavior that the fanatical Chinese exhibited against the Japanese will be repeated if Beijing does not strive to educate their people on the importance of sportsmanship.
Let's hope that the Beijing authorities have learned from the Asian Cup experience and will be prepared to uphold the spirit of the Olympics, and to provide safety to all international athletes and foreign visitors when the 2008 Olympic games begin. The stakes involve more than just the number of medals won -- China's reputation as a member of the civilized international community will also be on the line.
Chen Ching-chih is professor emeritus of history at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville and a research fellow at the Los Angeles-based Institute for Taiwanese Studies.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry