A decisive blow against poverty was struck when India's new finance minister, Chidambaram, released the 2004/2005 budget.
India is a country on the move, with rapid economic development and dazzling dynamism in the information technology sector. Yet it is also home to 300 million of the world's poorest people.
In May's national elections, India's rural voters unseated the ruling coalition. The lesson was clear: focus on rural poverty. The new government has listened, putting forward a program that is dazzling in its implications, both for India and for the developing world.
India's new government is led by a "dream team" of development experts. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is one of the world's leading development economists. It was Singh, serving in mid-1991 as India's finance minister, who began India's market reforms.
He dismantled decades of inefficient and ineffective government restraints on trade, investment and entrepreneurship, unleashing more than a decade of the fastest economic growth in India's history.
renowned team
Upon becoming prime minister, Singh brought into government an experienced and internationally renowned team, including Chidambaram, who served as finance minister in the mid-1990s, and Montek Singh Ahluwalia, who heads the Planning Commission, the key body assessing India's medium-term public investment strategies.
When Singh's government came into office, there were fears that he would be hamstrung by left-wing coalition partners, who would demand that market reforms be dismantled as the price of their participation in the new ruling coalition. Chidambaram's 2004/2005 budget puts those fears to rest. The document is a brilliant lesson in development economics: it shows how to combine a full-speed-ahead approach to market reforms with urgently needed attention to poverty. In short, the budget is a model for all developing countries.
At the heart of the budget is the realization that reducing poverty requires both rapid economic growth and targeted investments aimed at the poorest of the poor.
Rapid economic growth is to be based on the private sector, including foreign direct investment. Thus the budget supports critical areas of market reform and growth promotion, including measures aimed at deepening the financial sector, promoting exports and liberalizing foreign direct investment.
The key, however, is that the budget does not rely simply on "trickle-down" economics to raise living standards. The second pillar of poverty reduction is targeted investments for the poor, particularly for the rural poor.
This approach commits India's national and state governments to ensuring that all Indians, including the poorest, have access to basic social investments, including health, nutrition and schooling, and to basic infrastructure including electricity, information and communications technology, safe drinking water and inputs for modern agriculture. Every village is to be lifted up in the next few years, empowered with the basic tools to become economically productive.
immense scale
The scale of the challenge is immense. There are an estimated 600,000 villages in this vast country of 1 billion citizens. Villages far from major ports and cities tend to be poorer and less invigorated by the recent economic growth.
The government proposes to equip these villages with the basic infrastructure and services they need to take off economically.
The government's programs are not mere populist promises. They reflect sensible investments that the government intends to pursue. The budget calls for a surtax on incomes to help pay for increased social expenditures.
The lesson for other developing countries is that spending on the poor for health, education, safe drinking water, electricity and the like is not simply pandering; it is a serious and productive investment.
It may be expensive to educate a child, but it is far more expensive to a society to leave a child without education. Uneducated children will be burdens on their societies for decades to come. It is far more rational to spend a little extra income now for a few years of schooling than face decades of social costs resulting from masses of uneducated adult workers.
But even India, with its growing economy, cannot afford to make these investments out of national resources. India will need some help, at least temporarily, from richer countries and international institutions like the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.
The rich world should not be grudging in its help to India. By providing a few billion dollars per year in assistance now, the donor world would ensure a prosperous, democratic and stable partner in India for decades to come. In other words, it is time for donors to step up to help reform-minded yet poor countries like India, and even more urgently, those in Africa that are similarly committed to economic development.
Economics professor Jeffrey Sachs directs the Earth Institute at Columbia University. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with