It has been seven years since Hong Kong was returned to China. International focus as of late has been on the issue of direct elections of the former colony's chief executive. Less attention has been paid to prospects for Hong Kong's economic development.
Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea -- the so-called Asian tiger economies -- are second only to Japan, and lead China in economic growth. But given China's rapid growth during the 1990s, many wonder whether China has surpassed the Asian tigers in this respect.
Some economists argue that GDP is an appropriate measure of a nation's wealth. Thus, we can measure the GDP of the Asian tiger economies relative to that of China to explain the changes in the wealth of these nations.
In 1990, Taiwan's GDP was 7.3 times greater than China's GDP. In 1995, that difference had shrunk to 5.8 times, and by 2002, it had shrunk further to 4.5 times.
During the same years, Hong Kong's per capita GDP was 12, 8.6 and 6 times greater. China has not been catching up with Taiwan's GDP as fast as it has with Hong Kong's, but is catching up with Taiwan's faster than it is with Singapore's.
In South Korea's case, its economy was 5.7, 4.6 and 3.7 times greater than China's over the same time period, making it the Asian economic tiger whose wealth gap with China shrank the most.
Since China still finds itself in the early stages of economic development, its growth rate will be faster, so the shrinking wealth disparity between China and the four Asian tigers is a normal part of the process of development.
By the second half of the 1980s, the competitive advantage of the Asian tiger economies was no longer based only on labor-intensive products for export, and the four gradually developed capital and technology-intensive industries.
Compared to the developed world, the bulk of foreign investment from the four Tigers went to less developed countries. This reflects the fact that many firms in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore or North Korea prefer a cost-reduction strategy.
The main reason for the closing wealth gap between China and the tiger economies was that, during this period, there were differing levels of foreign investment in the Chinese economy.
Hong Kong invested the most, followed by Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea. A simple analysis reveals that countries with close economic ties with China may gain advantages in the short run, but such ties will prove disadvantageous in the long run. Hong Kong and Singapore are two good examples.
During the 1980s, Hong Kong businesses adopted cost-reduction strategies in production and moved their factories to China, where land and labor were cheap.
What's more, the Hong Kong government did not restrict this development, which led to large flows of capital and technology to China.
Because they lacked the ability to "use knowledge to create value," this migration of production led to a very slow upgrading of Hong Kong's industries, which in its turn caused the value of Hong Kong's manufacturing proportion of its overall GDP to fall from 23.6 percent in 1980 to 6 percent last year.
The speed of deindustrialization was much faster than in any developed country, and caused unemployment in the territory to rise significantly.
At the time, government and industry groups in Hong Kong took the attitude that production service industries would create new job opportunities. As the competitiveness of production service industries in Guangdong Province improved significantly, Hong Kong manufacturers setting up operations there found it more convenient to begin using the production services provided by local companies instead of those from Hong Kong. This led to a rapidly deteriorating employment situation in Hong Kong.
Chinese investment by Taiwanese firms as part of its overall GDP grew from less than 1 percent in 2000 to 1.8 percent last year, which shows that many Taiwanese companies are still pursuing cheap labor and production costs.
As a result, the product differentiation between Taiwan and China's exports will decrease, making Taiwanese products less competitive.
To minimize this risk, Taiwan's government should continue to apply appropriate restrictions on Chinese investment and increase the pressure on manufacturers to modernize their businesses.
This is like placing a stone of suitable weight on green beans to make them sprout; only the appropriate pressure will lead to positive growth.
Kenneth Lin is an economics professor at National Taiwan University and former finance director for Kaohsiung City.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs