The Taipei Representative Office in the UK has now made the same mistake twice by issuing documents to Andrew Wang (
Tien and Chien are senior political officials, and both have served as foreign minister. They both heard President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) express his determination to get to the bottom of Yin's murder and the frigate scandal, even if it rocked the nation. As part of the government's leadership, Tien and Chien should have exerted their greatest effort to prevent this latest incident from happening. Sadly, the major criminal suspect, Andrew Wang, has twice escaped through the loopholes of Taiwan's diplomatic system. In the face of this incident over document verification, Tien and Chien can only accept the blame, without having the opportunity to provide any explanation.
Chang Chia-hua (張家華) -- the official in the UK office who issued the documents to Wang -- has already made the same administrative mistake twice. This not only shows her lack of vigilance, but also demonstrates the flaws in the document verification system of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its offices abroad. However, although Premier Yu Shyi-kun and the public severely condemned this mistake, ministry officials -- and Chang herself -- seemed to believe that the mistakes were insignificant. They claimed they did not violate any laws, and that it was merely an administrative flaw, since the UK office failed to immediately report Yeh's application to the ministry. These administrative officials also blamed Yu and his Cabinet for making a fuss over a trifling matter and criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government for passing the buck to others.
Whether these officials have violated the law will be decided later in the investigation by our judicial agencies. What we are concerned about now is their attitude. In any efficient and successful private enterprise, employees are dismissed if they break the law. Even if they only break internal regulations, they face serious punishment. Surprisingly, these government officials did not view their administrative mistakes seriously, and did not mind damaging the government's image and reputation. They did not even admit their mistakes. This is why the ministry should be criticized as muddleheaded and careless, and why it is unable to deal with today's rapidly-changing international situation.
On Sunday night, when Tien arrived in Taipei, he made a five-point statement, asking the ministry to "act according to the law and guarantee individual rights" by giving officials involved in the case a chance to present their side of the story. Tien emphasized that representative offices, in conducting their consular duties, must follow instructions from their superiors. In saying this, Tien is underlining the fact that the representative office may not be solely to blame for the mistake over document verification. The ministry may be an accomplice in the case.
On this point, one is inclined to agree with Tien. It is also important that the media base their reporting on proven facts, rather than flights of fancy inspired by support for either the pan-blue or pan-green camp. Examples of such rumors include the notion that this is the result of an internal power struggle within the DPP, or that people are after Tien and Chien's jobs. This sort of groundless speculation only confuses the issue, and results in further damage to the reputations of the government and the officials involved.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under