It has been over four months since the presidential election. But it's irritating that Taiwan's society is still in the shadow of the election dispute. Although President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) took office on May 20 and have started to perform their duties in accordance with the law, the opposition fought stubbornly against them in continuous protests.
The shooting of the president and vice president on the eve of the election caused an uproar in this country. In response to the matter, independent Legislator Sisy Chen (陳文茜) announced on Thursday that she would establish a group called the "Plaza" by late next month, to train talent to look into the case, and to participate in the related lawsuits. But even the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has kept its distance from her this time, as everyone knows by now that Sisy is not an asset to the pan-blue camp. Rather, her latest scheme is aimed at boosting the momentum of the newly established Taiwan Democratic School as the year-end legislative elections approach so it can attempt to absorb pan-blue votes.
The shooting has even caused an uproar abroad. The pan-blue camp produced and distributed a pamphlet entitled Bulletgate to make baseless accusations against the government and its handling of the case. Unfortunately, the pan-blue camp does not trust the investigation in its current form, or the legal system in charge of the ballot recount. Bulletgate will not help us to discover the truth or solve the election dispute. It will only damage Taiwan's international image. As for the dispute over the election result, after the ballot recount by lawyers from both sides under the supervision of the Taiwan High Court is completed, we must await the court's final ruling. But the pan-blue camp's legal team called a press conference on Thursday, claiming that a total of 907,164 electoral irregularities were discovered during the examination of voter rosters nationwide, and that such irregularities took place in 99.34 percent of the polling stations.
These figures released by the blue camp are shocking, but prior to their release, there had been no debate on the findings and the judges have yet to make their ruling. It was little more than a unilateral declaration by the pan-blue camp's lawyers. And there are other facts in these figures. First, the recount could change the election outcome by 7,655 votes -- so even if all these votes were for the pan-blue ticket, it is still far too few to overturn the election. At this point, they have no hope of overturning the legitimacy of Chen's re-election.
The pan-blue lawyers have also emphasized irregularities in the voter rosters, which is an attempt to pave the way for further litigation to nullify the election result. Even though the Taiwan High Court has not yet begun to hear the case, the pan-blues are already preparing a second legal battle.
In their endless resistance, one cannot help but admire the persistence of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜). Even people within the KMT are getting tired of this obstinate struggle, which is blocking the way to internal party reforms. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and KMT Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) have both made a point of distancing themselves from the election controversy, so it is hardly surprising that the majority of voters are fed up with this endless controversy.
Democratic politics is built on the foundation of doing what is best for the majority of people. Politicians should therefore think about what will benefit the the public and not just their own personal agendas. The pan-blues' insistence on keeping up the struggle over the presidential election is likely to not only hurt their performance in the legislative elections, but will also harm Taiwan. Lien and Soong remain stubbornly defiant, even as they put Taiwan's welfare on the line. Does this count as a good political decision?
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs