The Taiwanese violinist Lu Kuan-cheng (盧冠呈), beating more than 400 competitors, has become the first Taiwanese to join the New York Philharmonic. According to media reports, members of the renowned orchestra earn an annual salary of US$100,000, which is far more than a musician in an orchestra in this country earns.
Before this announcement, media organizations had been discussing how the salaries of famous conductors and music directors of US orchestras kept increasing while musicians' salary increases are decreasing or stagnant. Well-known conductors often perform with two orchestras, earning salaries as high as US$1 million or US$2 million per year, although they only spend between four and five months with an orchestra. Musicians with world-class organizations earn at most US$100,000 per year, and senior musicians earn between US$200,000 and US$300,000 per year.
For example, the New York Philharmonic's music director, Lorin Maazel, earns an annual salary of US$2,840,000, but only has to conduct the orchestra for 14 weeks. The highest-paid musician, principal violin Glenn Dicterow -- who also is Lu's teacher -- earns US$360,000 per year. Other principal musicians earn just above US$200,000 per year.
By most people's standards, US$100,000 is considered a very high salary, but in New York it will barely allow you to maintain an upper-middle-class standard of living. Nor should we forget that these musicians have to shoulder the cost of expensive instruments.
In general, the number of ethnic minority musicians in orchestras is increasing, and almost one-half of these are Asians. This phenomenon is an indicator of the outstanding achievements of Asian artists.
But from the perspective of market economics and some Westerners, Asian musicians could be viewed as mere economic immigrants, "cheap" laborers who take away jobs from locals and decrease the opportunities for salary increases for all musicians. But the overall industry is still in the hands of locals, and immigrants are all but exploited as "cheap labor."
If it weren't for the supply of talented immigrant musicians, it would be difficult for US orchestras to maintain their musical standards. Classical music would decline without immigrants. The continued increase in the numbers of immigrant musicians will have a cultural impact on classical music in the US and Europe, leading to innovation.
Like most countries, the US and Taiwan face pressures of supply and demand. Without new immigrants and foreign workers, the economies of both countries would become unbalanced and unsustainable.
Some people will say that the US imports "first-rate" labor, while Taiwan is doing the opposite.
Ten years ago, Lee Yuan-tseh (
From a market perspective, the fact that Taiwan bring in large numbers of foreign spouses and wage laborers instead of skilled and advanced workers has led to an imbalance of foreign talent here.
Don't forget that "advanced" and "inferior" are relative values. What we call talented musicians here are workers through the eyes of those in the US cultural industry.
But more important than this, immigrant workers in US orchestras -- like Taiwan's immigrants and foreign workers -- add new blood and vitality to society.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with