Tropical Storm Mindulle brought destruction to the crops, housing and power supplies in central and southern Taiwan with heavy rain, landslides and floods. It also resulted in tragedy to the families of those killed. Given that Taiwan is known to be prone to natural disasters, is the government really so powerless in averting these kinds of catastrophes?
The island of Taiwan was thrown up as a result of tectonic plate movements. Typhoons and heavy rains have, over the course of the centuries, taken their toll, causing land and mud slides in mountainous areas. Flood waters carried rock and debris down to lower areas, creating what is now the western coastal plain in a process that has taken millennia. This means that the severe geological changes taking place in Taiwan are the results of natural phenomena.
In recent decades there has been a considerable increase in the island's population, and economic growth has required people to move to once uninhabited land, settling in areas around rivers or in the mountains. This activity has increased the rate of geological changes, precipitating nightmarish natural disasters.
The lessons learned eight years ago from Typhoon Herb, which caused widespread flooding and landslides throughout Taiwan, have gradually faded from peoples' memories. And just like Typhoon Herb, Mindulle and the July 2 disaster it caused has taught us again the importance of respecting the natural environment on which we rely for our existence.
In fact, following Typhoon Herb and the 921 Earthquake, the government and public set about reconstruction according to their needs -- continuing to develop further into the mountains and, without a thought for the environment, cut service roads straight to the highest areas catering to crop land all over the mountains. This activity could be the prelude to yet another natural disaster.
Over the years the government has had reservoirs and dams built upstream to manage water supplies and erected check dams to prevent mudslides. Downstream the populace has been using sand and gravel for such purposes, upsetting the natural supply of this material deposited in rivers and altering the inherent balance of the river beds. It is no wonder that river buttresses are easily ripped away during floods and infrastructure along river banks are destroyed. The long-term reduction of sand and gravel deposits in estuaries has increased the level of erosion on the west coast as the coastline continues to contract.
It is a well-known fact that the long term syphoning of subterranean water by fish farms has caused the southwest coastal region to subside to below sea level, necessitating the construction of dykes and embankments and causing serious land conservation problems.
Despite the fact that everything appeared to have returned to normal in a matter of days, the floodwaters are seeping deep down into the ground, replacing the syphoned water and salinating the ground water. As a result, future generations will not find it economically viable to use subterranean water supplies.
It usually takes a natural disaster before people realize how important it is to respect the land we live on and the principles of nature. It brings to mind the two-month flooding of the Mississippi River in the US in 1993, where the waters broke the embankments, causing much distress to the surrounding populace, after which time there was a revision in attitudes towards the marshlands and the river itself.
The Taiwanese people have also had their share of experience with disasters. The dangers of building infrastructure next to mountain slopes were witnessed after the Lincoln Mansions tragedy during Typhoon Winnie in 1997. This disaster led to a review of building regulations, and a temporary ban was placed on construction near such slopes.
In the 921 Earthquake we witnessed incredible destructive power threatening life and property, the force of which actually altered the geography of the island. The earthquake also wrought destruction on the Central Cross-Island Highway that was built at so much cost during the 1950s, and reconstruction work on the roads is still taking place. This again made the government and the public think about the consequence of our activity when subjected to the whim of the environment.
Every time there is a disaster like this there are calls for the government to make amendments to the laws and to introduce more far-reaching policies geared at protecting the environment. What good will this do, though, when people prioritize their own economic well-being above and beyond that of the environment? The solution to this problem is to educate people about the environment and ensure that the next generation is more aware of how we can live safely within it.
When there is a consensus of the concept of environmental sustainability, we may finally see a reversal of the continued decline in the environment that we are seeing today.
Chia Yee-ping is a professor in the department of geosciences at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with