On Thursday, Hong Kong's Wen Wei Po daily reported that Jiang Zemin (江澤民), chairman of China's Central Military Commission said during a commission meeting that China's biggest security threat over the next 20 years will be the "Taiwan issue."
Jiang said that the first 20 years of the 21st century would be a period of strategic opportunity for China, but the Chinese government should not indefinitely put off a resolution to the "Taiwan issue," adding that Beijing will resolve the issue by force if "outside forces" support Taiwan's independence. The former president's remarks have been interpreted as a timetable for China's military offensive against this country. Will 2020 be Taiwan's hour of doom?
Beijing says that President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) planned constitutional referendum in December 2006 highlights the need to find a resolution to this issue in a timely fashion. Although the first 20 years of this century are regarded as a period of development for China, Beijing does not exclude the possibility of resolving the "Taiwan issue" during this critical period.
Jiang, who has tightly consolidated his power as military chief, was speaking to the hawks in China's military establishment when speaking about the "Taiwan issue." He was also speaking directly to Taiwan in an attempt to frighten it into accepting the "one China" principle; and to the US to test their limits.
But Jiang's position is hardly sufficient enough grounds to justify a military invasion of this country. It would convince neither the Chinese nor Taiwanese people of the "one China" principle, not to mention that the international community -- who would not sit back complacently and watch this brutal action unfold.
Despite tense cross-strait relations at the moment, the government has kept a rein on itself in the face of internal calls for independence, and has not crossed the line far enough to provoke China into military action. Chen even changed his campaign promise from making a new constitution to "promoting constitutional re-engineering and the re-establishment of the constitutional order" in his inaugural speech on May 20.
If China attacks Taiwan simply because it is unwilling to "be united," the one that crosses the "red line" will be China.
The bottom line for the US with regard to the cross-strait issue is clear: to maintain the status quo. The US will not allow the status quo to be defined unilaterally by either Beijing or Taipei. It will retain its own standard for interpretation, which is to say that it wants a continuation of a situation in where Taiwan does not declare independence and China does not use military force to bring the nation under its control.
Any change to this situation needs to be decided through cross-strait dialogue. But the Communist regime not only refuses to acknowledge Taiwan's offer to negotiate on technological or political issues, it also said it is eager to force Taiwan into submission through military intimidation. Taiwan's government finds this unacceptable and believes the US will also find this unacceptable.
As the US presidential campaign gets into full swing, China has used this sensitive time to threaten Taiwan militarily and diplomatically, going so far as to test long range ballistic missiles and conduct amphibious landing exercises, in addition to its usual barrage of rhetoric. With such constant mid-level alerts, neither Taiwan nor the international community can let down their guard.
This country needs to maintain the necessary military protection while the US needs to be vigilant against China's two-pronged policy of readying for attack on one hand and protesting Washington's weapons sale to Taiwan on the other. Taipei and the international community should make it clear to Beijing that the bottom line for the cross-strait issue is peace, and that any attempt to use military force is totally unacceptable.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations