Following the experiences of the EU's euro-zone region, a common currency area for Asia is being widely discussed. Even though an Asian monetary union is a fantasy that ignores both economic and political realities, even respectable economists have opined on the matter.
For example, Robert Mundell, a Nobel laureate in economics, has made statements in support of the creation of an Asian monetary union. Citing exchange rate volatility between the Japanese yen and the US dollar as being a problem for Asian economies, he suggested introducing a common currency area patterned on the euro-zone.
A private study group of the International Bureau of the Japanese Finance Ministry has promoted the idea of a unified currency for Asia.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Unsurprisingly, it begins with a plan for greater use of the yen in transactions in the region. The final report of the Study Group for the Promotion of the Internationalization of the Yen indicated that a unified currency would increase financial and economic cooperation among ASEAN countries, Japan, China and South Korea.
These proposals have not gone unheeded. ASEAN countries, along with Japan, China, and South Korea set up a system of swap agreements in May 2000 to reduce volatility in exchange rate fluctuations and to protect their currencies from speculative attacks.
In fact, there are many reasons that Asian countries should hesitate before making radical moves toward increased cooperation of their monetary authorities. In the first instance, coordinated monetary policy leads to a reduction in sovereignty. When an economy has free trade but fixed exchange rates, the domestic price level will fluctuate in order to absorb changes in international trade and financial flows. In the case of Hong Kong, it also brought a long cycle of deflation.
A more important point is that Asia does not constitute what economists refer to an "optimum currency area" whereby a single currency would generate net economic benefits. Supporters of an Asian currency union make a heroic assumption that East Asia might constitute such an area. However, this assertion reflects a political judgment that had little to do with the interconnectedness of Asian economies.
While there is more convergence in economic and political conditions in Europe, it is not clear that it is so well-suited to be a common currency area. One key element in the theoretic models is the high mobility of labor.
Language and cultural differences along with distrust of outsiders renders much of Europe's labor relatively immobile.
Needless to say, such differences in Asia are much wider than they are in Europe. Never mind migration barriers and diverse political regimes in Asia, there are widely uneven economic development patterns both within and between countries. While many rural areas depend upon agricultural output while urbanized regions depend upon manufacturing and energy production, the more advanced urban areas and city-states depend more heavily upon services. Consequently, external shocks will have asymmetrical impacts on different economic sectors of each country. And these shocks will impact upon the different geographical regions across countries and within each country. A single currency would eliminate the shock-absorbing capacity offered by national currencies. Without the safety-valve effect of a fluctuating local currency, unequal development between and within countries will become amplified and rigid.
An argument behind having a single currency is that it would reduce the costs of exchanging currencies by tourists, businesses and governments.
Added to the saving from avoiding these "transactions costs," there would be a reduction in the risk associated with holding foreign currencies. However, the reduction of money-changing costs does not require a unified currency. Technology has helped to reduce the costs to tourists of having national currencies that are supposed to be eliminated by currency union. Something as simple as credit cards has allowed people to minimize the costs of using multiple currencies.
Costs to tourists of transacting many different foreign currencies are trivial in value and volume to those that might confront companies with multinational dealings. And so it is that the development of new currency instruments allowed hedging strategies that are relatively low-cost for businesses. Innovations in the "financial derivatives" markets allow enterprises to avoid or minimize most of the risks of fluctuations in foreign currencies.
There is a case where a common currency can emerge spontaneously to benefit trading partners. As it is, the US dollar is already a commonly accepted currency used primarily for international trade. Local settlements could be carried out in the US currency that would circulate alongside national currencies. Following Gresham's Law, the less reliable currency would drive the good one out of circulation as a medium for transactions. The sounder money will become the basis of savings. If a local currency begins to weaken, savings can be converted into the dollar while the local currency would be used in daily transactions.
The good news is that implementing such a proposal does not require armies of researchers and international bureaucrats to hold conferences in five-star resorts. Of course, the bad news is that the people who benefit from such largesse would rather not give up the perks and importance.
Given the interventionist inclinations of politicians and international agencies, the construction of a single Asian currency is likely to be a complicated and evolutionary process. The first steps would involve closer coordination of monetary policies and some fixing of exchange rates.
Indeed, this is what happened in Europe with the so-called exchange-rate mechanism (ERM) that created massive short-run instability. In the early1990s, the Fed became concerned about holding down inflation and raised interest rates. As rates in the US rose, it caused pressures to de-link European currencies.
Eventually, the ERM broke down as massive currency realignments took place.
Attempts to rig foreign exchange markets have reinforced macroeconomic instability within much of Asia. Instead of spending time and money concocting pipe dreams that enrich researchers, it would be far better to initiate policies that promote investment by allowing private entrepreneurs to keep more of the fruits of their efforts.
Only politicians and social engineers believe that economic developments follow political constructions. In the real world, economic forces set limits and provide the momentum for the success of political arrangements.
When these forces clash, politics will ultimately be the loser.
Unfortunately, the adjustment periods involve real economic pain due to dislocations, misallocations and inefficiencies arising from political decisions that conflict with economic forces.
Christopher Lingle is professor of economics at Universidad Francisco Marroque in Guatemala.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under