KMT learning from mistakes
The current internal power struggle in Beijing for control of the Central Military Commission is an interesting contrast to the current dilemma faced by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leaders in Taiwan.
Both the Chinese Communist Party and the KMT are organized loosely around Marxist-Leninist ideology, which may be characterized as rather rigid and authoritarian. Thus the ability of these parties to adapt and to retain their legitimacy is being tested, but in two very different environments.
On the one hand, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is again locked in a bitter internal feud to see which faction -- the one led by Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The KMT's problems are organizational. After democratization, they believed that by staying the same course they have steered for the past 50 years, they could hold onto power in the same illiberal way as the Liberal Democratic Party has done in Japan or the Institutional Revolutionary Party in Mexico. They assumed that people crave continuity and fear change, not realizing that once voters saw that the world didn't end with the election of President Chen Shui-bian(
Even after being beaten several times at the polls, however, the same tragic human lust for power has allowed a clique of leaders to hinder the much-needed party reform process. KMT Chairman Lien Chan, or "Big brother Lien," as his followers have nicknamed him, and PFP Chairman James Soong have not grasped the dynamic change that Taiwan and its people have undergone, making them dinosaurs on the democratic landscape.
But there is hope for the KMT as internal grumbling and external failure has awoken many to the need for reform. By changing to meet the needs of the people they hope to represent, they will also offer hope for a vibrant democracy built on multiparty competition.
As Samuel Huntington once pointed out, while democracies may sometimes seem loud and unruly, they are in fact the most stable political systems because people can find non-violent outlets for their demands. Street protests in Taiwan are not a sign of weakness, but rather of the system working properly.
But on the other side of the strait, tired CCP officials try to pass off oligarchy for "democratic centralism" and attempts to legitimate their ideologically bankrupt regime on the dated notion of pan-Chinese nationalism. The KMT is learning that the lack of intra-party openness leads to poor electoral outcomes. In the same way, neither the international community nor the people of Taiwan will trust China as long as its internal politics are mired in oblique backroom power struggles closed to public accountability.
What these two internal party struggles show is that indeed, the idea that Taiwan should be part of China because of some common, yet distant, historical origin ignores the more relevant recent history of de facto separation and development.
Vladimir Lenin was buried long ago; let's also bury his party system.
Albert Chen
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.