In recent times, the Chiang family has acted as an umbilical cord connecting Taiwan and China, and the bodies of former presidents General Chiang Kai-shek (
The decision for the two Chiangs to be laid to rest in Taiwan represents the fact that the political force that arrived in Taiwan from China has given up its dream of "retaking the mainland."
Prior to 1949, the fascist Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) led by Chiang Kai-shek, plagued with internal corruption, lost the support of the Chinese people. Their defeat at the hands of the Communists forced them to flee to Taiwan. In Taiwan, Chiang Kai-shek resumed his strong-man tactics and maintained martial law, in the course of which countless lives were sacrificed during the 228 incident and the period of "White Terror." Both Chiang Kai-shek and his son, Chiang Ching-kuo, viewed Taiwan as merely a base of operations, a springboard from which to return to China. As a result, they gave little thought to the long-term construction of Taiwan or the welfare of its people.
When the US-ROC Mutual Defense Treaty was signed in 1954, it was clear that the Chiang family no longer believed that there was any hope of retaking China, so this idea became a tool for them to maintain their monopoly on political power.
Only during his later years in power did Chiang Ching-kuo realize that the KMT, an alien power in Taiwan, would never return to China, and if he did not move towards localization, the KMT would have no place left to go. He therefore promoted people from the local elite to let Taiwanese people rule Taiwan, and tolerated the democratization and liberalization of Taiwan. The KMT's political localization was meant to maintain the KMT's political power and turn Taiwan into a base for opposing Beijing.
This move showed that he was already preparing to remain in Taiwan. In addition, he often travelled to different areas in Taiwan in his later years, building an image of being close to the people. He even said that "I am also Taiwanese," and to a certain degree developed emotional bonds with Taiwan.
Returning to the place of one's birth to die is a custom among Chinese people. So although there are many in Taiwan who still harbor a hatred of the Chiang family, there are many others who respect them and find the idea of their burial in Taiwan more congenial than to be returned to a China they regard as an enemy and whose intentions are uncertain.
Madam Chiang Kai-shek, who represents the first generation who moved to Taiwan, has now passed away, and the Chiang family no longer has the responsibility or the duty to bring the KMT back to power in China. Faina Chiang Fang-liang has decided that it is in the interests of the Chiang family that the two Chiangs should now be buried in Taiwan and end the rootlessness of the Chiang family since they moved from China. Now that the family's roots have been planted in Taiwan, Chiang Ching-kuo's claim that he "is also Taiwanese" can finally be said with a clear conscience.
The establishment of the Chiang family roots in Taiwan will also resolve many of the contradictions in the self-identification of the Mainlanders who came over with them. The burial will help them to accept the reality that they have long since become Taiwanese, and this in turn will help resolve the issue of Taiwan's own identity.
Now that the two Chiangs will be buried in Taiwan, the KMT will also have to think clearly about whether they are the Chinese Nationalist Party or the "Taiwan Nationalist Party."
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry