Procomp Informatics Ltd, a listed company, has filed a restructuring plan with the local district court as a result of the company's defaulting on its corporate bond payments. The financial repercussions of this action have reverberated for several days. The case is fraught with suspicions of wrongdoings, and a preliminary look at the case reveals similarities to the Enron scandal in the US.
Enron was once the seventh biggest corporation in the US. Established in 1987, it was called the "most innovative company" and the "company with biggest growth potential" by Fortune Magazine for several years in a row. After its share price reached a high of US$81 per share in 2001, fraudulent accounting practices caused prices to fall to US$0.26. In December that year, the company filed for bankruptcy and restructuring. Legal handling of the Enron scandal is continuing to this day, and it is having a political and economic impact in both the US and internationally.
Enron's highest annual return exceeded US$100 billion. The following three factors are generally considered to be the reasons why the company ended with bankruptcy and delisting from the stock market: Untruthful accounting that did not match facts, in particular false reporting of profits and debt; systemic shortcomings, ineffective internal controls and nominal external auditing; and reliance on untruthful performance reports to attract funds, hurting investors.
The Procomp Informatics case, which already has been out in the open for several days, still awaits clarification. Although the company's founder has provided a public explanation, the situation is still mired in doubt, which shows that there are major problems. Most fundamental are the problems of Procomp itself, including questions concerning whether funds have been temporarily appropriated for private use or taken out of the company, the abnormal trading in the company's shares before and after the restructuring announcement, the transfers on the day restructuring took place, and even whether financial reports are deceptive or false.
This is not only reflects on the founder's honesty and credibility, but it also highlights major shortcomings in the company's corporate governance. The suspected false financial reports also bring up the issue of dividing responsibility between Procomp and its certified accountants.
In addition, Procomp planned to issue global depository receipts to make up for financial deficits, but a conflict over insider trading arose between the company and the underwriting bank, CitiBank. Company funds deposited overseas also involved questions regarding whether the bank had provided false information. It still remains to be seen whether any illegalities have occurred.
Because Procomp is a listed company that finds its funding among the general public, the concerned authorities should ascertain that the company's corporate governance procedures are in place and provide the public with details.
The Procomp case reflects problems with the securities markets' early warning mechanisms, and also that there are several shortcomings in related commercial accounting and banking operations. Systemic, legislative and administrative steps must be taken to prevent such matters from occurring again.
Thus, sound and comprehensive systems and laws must be put in place. These systems and laws must be used to block and eliminate situations conducive to greed or fraud and provide effective warning and supervision when problems in financial markets first appear.
Lu Shih-xiang leads the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and