As summer beckons, we should take a moment to focus on the sun's dark side. The source of all life on Earth, the sun is also a fountain of environmental carcinogens. Specifically, we now know that the sun's ultraviolet radiation is the primary cause of most skin cancers.
Skin cancer, long thought to be a disease of little public health significance, has now become epidemic. An estimated 90,000 new cases of malignant melanoma and well over 1 million cases of non-melanoma skin cancer will occur in the US this year. Melanoma will cause 8,000 deaths, and non-melanoma skin cancer will kill another 2,000. Melanoma is now the most common cancer in women aged 24 to 35. Once a disease of men in their 50s and 60s, it is now not unusual for women in their 20s to develop basal cell cancer or squamous cell cancer.
While the incidence of skin cancer has risen dramatically, so has our understanding of its causes. For over 50 years, ultraviolet radiation from the sun has been the No. 1 suspected cause of skin cancer. Epidemiologic data from Australia, animal studies with artificial sources of ultraviolet light and the development of skin cancer in individuals with a genetic inability to correct the DNA damage caused by ultraviolet radiation provided circumstantial evidence of the connection. Recent work has made the causal link between the sun and skin cancer at the molecular and cellular level.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Ultraviolet radiation causes specific and unique mutations in the tumor suppressor gene that produces a protein called p53. This protein is involved in a process called apoptosis in which damaged cells commit "suicide" to ensure that their defective genes are not passed on to daughter cells. (This is perhaps the first indication that self-sacrifice may be an intrinsic human trait!) Damaged by the sun, but not quite able to commit suicide, the mutated cell continues to proliferate at the expense of normal surrounding cells, resulting in a pre-cancerous growth that can progress to a full-blown squamous cell carcinoma.
But how should we communicate to people about skin cancer and its prevention? If our key message is "stay out of the sun forever," we are doomed to fail. Creating a culture of cave dwellers is no way to decrease the incidence of skin cancer.
Moreover, in educating the public we confront formidable forces: cultural icons who are as bronze as the statuary in the Louvre, the sheer pleasure of being in the sun, and the perceived incremental health benefits of ultraviolet radiation. The dearth of pale actors, actresses, corporate leaders and politicians confirms that a tan is now identified with health, wealth and power, rather than the travails of the working class, as in the past.
The artificial tanning industry promises that ultraviolet radiation from their machines causes less damage than natural sunlight. But in both cases, a tan is the body's response to injury. Microscopic pigment granules produced by skin pigment cells aggregate around the cell's nucleus to shield the DNA from the marauding rays and prevent mutation. It is irrelevant whether the ultraviolet radiation came from a bulb or a star.
Whether natural or artificial, ultraviolet radiation causes the skin to age prematurely. The inescapable irony is that teenagers and young women pursue a tan to look more attractive, but trade a moment or two of sunny radiance for a whole lifetime of premature wrinkles, fine lines and haggard-looking skin. As young people consider themselves immortal, not even appeals to lifelong vanity, let alone warnings about cancer, are sufficient to deter them from the tanning booths.
But the difficulties of educating the public about the causes of skin cancer do not diminish our obligation to try. There are enough other diseases about which we do not have a clue as to the cause. With skin cancer, we know very well how we can prevent it -- and prevention is always easier than treatment.
A good place to start is to ensure that the public has access to accurate information. While pseudoscience and the anti-aging industry represent an important source of potential misinformation, the Internet often provides damaging false information as well. Amazingly, the Internet has the same level of credibility with the patient as television does with the consumer: "I read it on the Web, so it must be true."
At the same time, tanning parlors should be regulated. While barbers, hairdressers, taxi drivers, bar owners, and doctors are often licensed, permits are rarely required to operate a tanning parlor. None of the other professions listed above, however, knowingly exposes its clients to a confirmed environmental carcinogen. Until the tanning industry chooses to police itself, customers should eschew the bulbs and pursue the spray: wear an artificial tan.
This preventable disease should be the focus of a comprehensive educational campaign similar to anti-smoking campaigns, which are now bearing fruit in many countries. In addition, scientific research on this most accessible of human organs will continue to identify innovative treatments and modes of prevention, which may well become applicable to other cancers.
Dr. David Leffell is professor of dermatology and surgery at the Yale School of Medicine; chief of the section of dermatologic surgery and cutaneous oncology at Yale New Haven Hospital; and senior associate dean for clinical affairs at the Yale School of Medicine. He is the author of Total Skin: The Definitive Guide to Whole Skin Care for Life.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose