The door has creaked open in talks on ending North Korea's nuclear ambitions, but analysts agreed on Monday that there is a long way to go because Pyongyang still sees atomic weapons as a crucial part of its survival strategy.
Host China, the two Koreas, Japan, Russia and the US ended a third round of talks in Beijing inconclusively on Saturday. Yet analysts -- and in particular South Korean officials, including President Roh Moo-hyun -- said this was the most productive session so far.
"Doors have opened," said Masao Okonogi, a Korea expert at Tokyo's Keio University. "Until now, both the United States and North Korea stuck to their basic principles. But this time, I think they took it a step further."
US officials put forward Washington's first detailed proposal, offering security guarantees and South Korean aid in return for North Korea agreeing to dismantle its nuclear programs. North Korea said it was ready to freeze its plutonium-based nuclear activities.
"We finally have `negotiations' worthy of the name," said the Hankyoreh newspaper, a left-wing South Korean daily.
But central to the undiminished differences between the US and North Korea was Washington's demand that Pyongyang disclose its uranium enrichment program, which can be used for making bombs. The North continued to deny it had such a scheme.
"I still think North Korea is very determined to develop a nuclear program and it is much easier to hide a highly enriched uranium program than a plutonium program," said Choi Jin-wook of Seoul's Korea Institute for National Unification think-tank.
"They still want to keep it secret and if possible they want to develop it," he said. "Or they want to use it as a bargaining chip later."
SURVIVAL STRATEGY
Wang Yizhou (王逸舟), deputy director of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said uncertainties still lay ahead, but he was cautiously optimistic.
"I am convinced the future process will not be very simple or smooth sailing. It could be a zigzag for multiple reasons and blame cannot be completely put on [North Korea]," said Wang, whose institute is a government think-tank.
Choi said North Korea's determination to have a nuclear arsenal went far beyond its deterrent value.
"It is very closely related to North Korea's intentions of how to run their system, the country, its long-term program of reform. This is not only the problem of the nuclear issue like in Ukraine or like in South Africa," he said. "It's a very, very essential part of North Korea's survival strategy."
Choi and other analysts said that even if the broad principles of a first-stage freeze could be agreed on, the tight timetable for working-level talks before the fourth round of negotiations in September meant negotiating details on verification, inspections, aid and dismantlement would be complex and controversial.
"There is still a long way to go," said the English-language edition of Japan's Asahi Shimbun. "Sharp confrontation may erupt when officials of the participating nations start mapping out details of the freeze."
Conservative South Korean newspapers and President Roh, whose administration is liberal and left-leaning, were unusually united in giving upbeat assessments of the latest talks, describing progress as significant and substantial, although the dailies did not disguise the task ahead.
Hankyoreh, the left-wing daily, said a major factor would be whether the US administration's hardliners would try to prevent progress ahead of the November presidential election.
Tokyo's Okonogi made a similar point, noting further progress could be made, depending on North Korea's response.
The North Korean Foreign Ministry said the talks had been positive but close examination of the US proposal showed little new, the South's Yonhap news agency reported. It also said the timetable was unrealistic.
"The key to solving the issue lies in the hands of these two countries," said the Global Times, a daily owned by the Chinese Communist Party's newspaper, the People's Daily. "If they do not compromise, nothing can be done."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under