In 2004, Taiwan's political democracy has undergone some most trying tests. Taiwan's narrow and winding road to democracy has had much to do with a political system established by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over a time span of 30 years after World War II. On the eve of the presidential election on March 20, President Chen Shui-bian (
lack of respect for law and order
After the defeat of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Lien and Soong joined forces to run for the presidency. They were determined to win at all costs. In front of 500,000 people attending a campaign rally they held in front of the Presidential Office, Lien hypocritically laid face down and flat on the ground to kiss the earth as a gesture to show his love for Taiwan. This gesture was intended to deceive the one million people who participated in the Feb. 28 Hand-in-Hand Rally into believing that he had abandoned the "one China" principle. At the same time, Lien and Soong did not forget to make personal attacks against Chen and Lu, fabricating stories to build an image of incompetence, deceit, and corruption for Chen. They were determined to end Chen's political career. Of course they did not forget to promise political favors to special interest groups. For example, they promised to cab drivers that once they were elected business license taxes and fuel taxes for cabs would no longer be levied. To retired workers, they promised an 18 percent interest rate on their retirement pensions. To civil servants, they promised an annual salary of NT$1 million. Moreover, those in power within the KMT openly placed large sums in bets with underground casinos that Lien and Soong would win the election, hoping to turn the tide of the election by influencing the large number of voters who participate in such underground gambling games.
In the March 20 election, the Chen-Lu ticket won 6,471,970 votes (50.11%), while the Lien-Soong 6,442,452 (48.89%). In addition, there were around 300,000 invalid ballots. Lien and Soong immediate declared that the election was illegal, stating that the large number of ballots declared invalid were evidence of foul play by the ruling party. They filed lawsuits with the High Court, after which the pan-blue camp and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) respectively appointed hundreds of attorneys to participate in the re-count of the votes. So far, there does not appear to be any deliberate tampering with the ballots, only some inadvertent misplacement of ballots has been discovered. As for the unusually high number of invalid ballots, this was caused by the newly adopted stricter criteria of validity, introduced to frustrate vote buying. After the re-count, the attorneys from both sides conceded that of the invalid ballots, 240,000 (almost 80 percent) were intended for Chen and Lu, while 60,000 (20 percent) were intended for Lien and Soong. Realizing that the result of the recount was unfavorable to them, Lien and Soong began to shift their focus on a campaign to demand that "there is no president without the truth."
merger plan
Chen and Lu were sworn into office on May 20. Around the same time, Lien declared a plan for a merger between the KMT and the PFP. Soong immediately responded to Lien's declaration, asking the KMT to purge politicians who belonged to the localized camp from the party, to smooth his way to taking over the KMT, something the localized faction bitterly opposed. The new post-election chaos now comes from the internal bickering of the pan-blues. The KMT's lawmakers and the younger generation of party officials reacted with hostility, asking Lien and Soong to get over their wounded pride concerning the election defeat. They believe a KMT-PFP merger and the lingering hatred will only have a negative impact on the year-end legislative election and lead to the ultimate collapse of the KMT. KMT lawmakers of the localized camp openly accused Lien of being unable to leave behind the negative sentiments engendered by his second election defeat, stating that the pending merger between KMT and PFP will only push KMT into a dead-end. They also believe that the "one China" path of the KMT has no market and no selling point, and that the merger is a self-destructive move. Voices within the party loudly demanded "opposing Soong and no supporting Lien." They asked Lien to resign from the party chairman post and oppose Soong's return to the KMT for a power succession.
Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
In the past 50 years, the KMT gradually transformed from a totalitarian party into a seemingly rational and ethnically harmonious party that embraced the "one China" path. The vindictive conduct of Lien and Soong after their election defeat appeared to have retrogressed the KMT into its old totalitarian self, turning it into a Chinese unification propaganda mouthpiece. James Chen (
Indeed, the KMT has a chance for reform only if Lien goes, thereby freeing the party from its historical and ethnic baggage and allowing it to re-invent itself. Four vice chairmen of the KMT have expressed this view. Ma was the first one to indicate that the KMT-PFP merger should not replace party reform. The KMT has a chance for survival only if reforms are made. The current structure of the KMT is of little interest to the Mainlander group. They cannot identify with the localized path previously pursued by former KMT chairman Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) when he was in power. The New Party is a Mainlander political party split from the KMT during the early days of Lee's efforts to localize the KMT. Soong was expelled from the KMT by Lee for running in the 2000 presidential election without the party's nomination. After his expulsion, some KMT lawmakers joined the PFP founded by Soong. In the 2000 legislative election, the PFP immediately garnered 42 seats. In terms of the nearly 3 million voters supporting the New Party and the PFP, around 90 percent were ethnic Mainlanders. Around 90 percent of the voters who voted for the KMT's incumbent lawmakers were native Taiwanese. The KMT had been transformed from a totalitarian party into a national and ethnically harmonious democratic party that gives top priority to the interests of Taiwan. That was why Soong's reaction to Lien's declaration about a KMT-PFP merger has been to demand a purge of some members of the party.
There is hope for the KMT only if it engages in reform. This is the consensus reached within the KMT after the presidential election. What kind of reforms are needed? Most importantly the abandonment of the "one China" dogma and black gold, as well as the return of the party's looted assets. Lien and Soong were able to join forces and run for the presidency and vice presidency entirely because the KMT had enough money and capital to try to buy their way into the Presidential Office. Vote-buying has corrupted the quality of Taiwan's political democracy. Both Lee Teng-hui and the senior KMT members of the localized camp hope that the KMT will undergo reform, becoming a rational party that promotes ethnic harmony and embraces the Taiwan-first path. Only if Ma and Wang Jin-pyng (
Reform of the KMT has begun. Party Vice Chairman Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) has been hosting a series of meetings on reforming the party. He has indicated that the party should accept its election defeat on March 20 and has expressed that view that the party should identify itself as a "localized party" with a "Taiwanese consciousness" platform. He frankly said that "from the `special state to state' discourse proposed by the then-president Lee Teng-hui in 1999, to the Feb. 28 Hand-in-Hand Rally this year, all these indicate that in the hearts of the Taiwanese, Taiwan's autonomy and sovereignty have long become a confirmed fact."
Siew's words were intended to give Lien and Soong a wake-up call to accept Chen Shui-bian as the 11th president of the Republic of China (ROC) and to encourage the KMT to identify with Taiwan, rather than China. This is because Taiwanese consciousness has become deep-rooted. The people of Taiwan now control their own destiny and future. Taiwanese no longer wants to be at the mercy of China, meaning that Taiwan no longer wants to be a mere chess piece manipulated by other countries. In view of this, Beijing seeks to localize the cross-strait relationship under the "one China" principle, so that Taiwan would only have the appearance of an independent country but remain incapable of participating in the international community as one.
starting ref0rm
Facing the current chaos in the KMT, Vincent Siew made a decision to reform the KMT's path, reiterating, "the ROC independently exists on the territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu." The KMT must adopt a localized path, and root itself among the general public. Facing criticism from the DPP for being a "Mainlander's political party" on a long-term basis, the KMT must seek to win moderate voters by leaving behind its "China consciousness."
Legislator Chen interpreted Taiwanese consciousness and sovereignty from the perspective of history. He pointed out that the high-handed and oppressive rule of the Mainlanders in the past has made the native Taiwanese resent Mainlanders, as well as stimulated the growth of the support for Taiwan's independence. Taiwanese voters do not accept the "one China" path. This is substantively reflected in the fact that although Chen Shui-bian only garnered the votes of 14 percent of Mainlander voters in this past election, yet he was able to garnered more than 50% of all votes cast. James Chen warned the KMT headquarters that the "one China" path has no market. There is hope only if the KMT leaves behind the dogma of unification and commits itself to maintaining the status quo of the ROC, and keeping an equal distance from the US, Japan and China.
Around 10 senior KMT lawmakers have already indicated that they won't run in the legislative election because they do not care to run under the KMT banner as long as Lien remains its leader. Even Wang Jin-pyng does not have the courage to run for an individual district seat and is instead running for an unelected at-large seat. Lien must retire if the KMT is to have a chance of survival. There is a future for the party only if Wang and Ma take over the party and push through reform.
Lee Chang-kuei (
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under