The Pentagon's Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China which was recently presented to Congress, noted that the possibility has been raised in some quarters that as a counter-threat against Chinese aggression, Taiwan could consider targeting densely populated cities or high-value infrastructure projects such as the Three Gorges Dam. Beijing responded violently to the suggestion, and according to a source close to the People's Liberation Army (PLA), quoted by the Straits Times of Singapore, the PLA countered that it not only had more than adequate resources to protect the Three Gorges Dam, but also that it had the capacity to target major dams in the US.
This shows the same attitude as Deputy Chief of the General Staff Xiong Guangkai's (雄光楷) statement in 1995, in which he threatened to launch nuclear missiles at Los Angeles if the US came to the defense of Taiwan. The Global Times, a newspaper under the umbrella of the People's Daily, has also quoted military sources as saying that if Taiwan launched a bombing raid against the Three Gorges Dam, the PLA would respond with sufficient force to "annihilate" Taiwan.
Even before this, a so-called military scholar, Xin Qi (辛旗), had spoken of "wiping out" Taiwan in a statement made in April 2000, a clear indication that China's vicious ambition to obliterate Taiwan predates and is not related to the suggestion of targeting the Three Gorges Dam.
The reason the Chinese leadership dares make continual military threats is that Taiwan is seen as unable to strike back. For this reason, they are willing to boast that they will pay any price in human lives or economic loss to achieve their goal of unification.
If Taiwan had medium-range missiles that could threaten the Zhongnanhai compound in Beijing or Yuquanshan, the headquarters of the Central Military Commission, threatening the lives of the warmongers without endangering innocent civilians, then they would not be so bold as to make their crazy threats.
The Chinese leadership is afraid of the US because it has missiles that have pinpoint accuracy and are able to penetrate underground bunkers. The Gulf War and the accidental 1999 bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade have taught former president Jiang Zemin (
China has also supplied weapons to Pakistan, including nuclear weapon technology, as a means of hemming in India, a country rather similar to China in some ways and a competitor in terms of economic and population growth. China even went to war with India in the early 1960s.
In January 2002, India successfully tested the Agni Ⅱ medium-range ballistic missile. It has a range of 2,500km, which could hit targets anywhere in Pakistan and in large areas of China. India is currently developing the Agni Ⅲ long-range ballistic missile, which would be able to target the densely populated cities of eastern and northeastern China. In January 2001, Vasudev Aatre, the scientific advisor to India's defense minister, pointed out that the new missile would be tested later that year. It was no secret that this missile was being developed as a deterrent to China.
The chairman of the Central Military Commission, Jiang Zemin (
Taiwan's nuclear development program was stopped by the US. Now that China's military capability is surging ahead, it is the responsibility of the US to protect Taiwan, not only through the sale of weapons, but also through support in such research and development. If Taiwan had missiles that could hit locations where China's leaders live, then the potential for conflict in the Taiwan Strait would be greatly reduced, and the chance of the US becoming embroiled in such a conflict would also be reduced.
Once Taiwan has acquired these missiles, it could make a statement rejecting their preemptive use, but retaining the right to use them in retaliation. This was the attitude China adopted when it began its nuclear program, After World War II, the military blocs of the East and West avoided nuclear devastation by creating a "balance of terror." In 1962, then president John Kennedy successfully resisted the threat of Soviet missile deployment in Cuba. The current cross-strait crisis also needs such mighty means and US boldness to achieve a resolution. Such a move would be the greatest possible memorial to all the late president Ronald Reagan sought to achieve.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY IAN BARTHOLOMEW
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations