When Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) inspected the Chinglu Detention Center for illegal Chinese immigrants in Hsinchu on June 15, he called on China to improve its efforts to halt the flood of illegal immigrants and for the two sides to sign an agreement dealing with their return to China, in an attempt at eliminating the problem once and for all. Wu correctly pointed out that the problem cannot be resolved by Taiwan alone.
This is yet another sign of goodwill on Taiwan's part, yet a solution relies not only on political forces on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, but also on social forces.
Is is absolutely not a matter of what President Chen Shui-bian (
Whether they come here of their own accord and the question of rights for sex workers are issues which simply do not arise, because this is not a free market, but a brutally controlled human meat market. Approximately 2,000 illegal immigrants are caught every year, but the actual number of people who are brought here illegally is much higher.
The existence of such a market shames both the Taiwanese and Chinese societies. Taiwan creates the demand, and China meets it. The underworld and corrupt forces in civil society in China and Taiwan run this market together. For political reasons, China's passivity in bringing these illegal immigrants home reveals the government's attitude toward its own people.
And what about Taiwan? As people are continually exposed to news reports about illegal immigrants being mistreated by boat crews and police using prostitutes to make an extra dollar, public curiosity in these Chinese women gradually abates and people begin to ignore the issue, telling themselves that these women belong to another, underground society, totally unrelated to their own lives.
China's reluctance to have these people returned adds to the misfortunes of the 1,000 to 2,000 people in Taiwanese detention centers. But shouldn't Taiwanese society also take the initiative to eliminate this inhumane market? The theory of supply and demand can only explain existing phenomena, but progressive social forces can actively change phenomena.
Tolerating the existence of such an exploitative, inhumane market further erodes the benevolent foundations of Taiwanese society. Maybe the human meat market will not enter your community, work place or social circles, but it exists in Taiwan, and it is expanding.
Not only does the political tension between China and Taiwan allow the two sides to ignore the responsibility of finding solutions to jointly created social problems, it has also become the force underlying the emergence of new problems. China allows Taiwanese gangsters to settle down in China, and during the recent presidential election, they were even allowed to organize. China's behavior will not only cost Taiwan and the cross-strait relationship dearly. These criminal forces will also erode Chinese society, leading to worsening bureaucratic rule and abuse of the public. Would a rational and responsible government try to destroy an opponent at the cost of throwing its own people into crisis?
Civil society on either side of the Taiwan Strait may have different views on the unification-independence issue, but based on a common belief in progress and a humane society, they should solve issues harmful to both societies together and share their common social values.
The exploitative human meat market and domineering criminal gangs should not be allowed, and the arms race's guarantee of mutual destruction is a price that must be paid by several generations of people. Progressive forces in both societies must take the initiative to suppress evil and create good conditions.
If they don't, a price will have to be paid by the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Although the two sides have different political ideals, they should share the dream of progress.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry