Taiwan has some very peculiar "academics." Sometimes it seems like they can be so contradictory to common sense as to give both academics and science a bad name. ["Academics speak out against arms purchases," June 15, page 4]
When we ordinary people consider something to be "expensive," we usually mean one of a few things. First, we can't afford it. Second, there are better products at a cheaper price. Third, we don't really need it.
If we apply this common-sense approach to the arms purchase, the answer is obvious. First, rather than "we can't afford it," we can't really afford not to have it. If China succeeds in taking over Taiwan, all the foreign reserves, per capita income, state and personal property would be taken over by the communists. Can we afford not to make a token investment in arms purchases now, when otherwise we might lose it all? Second, clearly there is no other product out there to be bought. Third, the need to acquire these arms, when faced with increasing threats from China, has been repeatedly expressed by our elected government, nationalized military, and our best friends, the US.
The question of how expensive these arms are appears to be the focus of much debate. Are we to trust these "academics" or "legislators" who have no heart for Taiwan's survival, but a very big heart for China?
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.