It seems a shame to many international observers that singer Chang Hui-mei (
It speaks poorly of the Chinese that they chose to mix politics with the entertainment industry. Did Chen do the same, by blacklisting some of the Taiwanese artists who chose to support the pan-blue camp in both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections? Were these artists or their careers affected in any way? That itself would sum up the key difference between the political cultures in communist China and democratic Taiwan. The former tolerates no dissenting views, and everyone has to abide by the "emperor's wishes." On the other hand, the latter advocates genuine freedom and choice, even on matters such as political affiliation.
China has to realize that politics has to be kept separate from other aspects of the people's lives, be it the sports, entertainment or even economic industries. If one day Arsenal star striker Thierry Henry were to visit Taiwan and acknow-ledged that he enjoyed his stay in Taipei, would the Chinese authorities ban him or his Arsenal squad from visiting China?
Apparently they would not, given the mass appeal of the English Premiership champions. Why then the double standard treatment dished out to artists such as A-mei or even Taiwanese businessmen who are pro-Taiwan? I suspect the protest by the students last week was crafted by the Chinese authorities. That would be both silly and naive of the Chinese authorities. As the saying goes, "forbidden fruit always tastes sweeter." The more China seeks to "punish" pro-Taiwan artists by banning their access to the Chinese market, the more likely it will become that its own citizens would seek other ways of supporting these performers, whether by ordering the singers' CDs online or by getting information from the Internet.
It is simply time for China to realize that in order to improve cross-strait relations, they have to deal with Chen at the highest level. They have to stop their silly antics of finding fault with Taiwanese, whether artists or businesspeople. The ball has been in China's court since May 2000. Unfortunately, they chose to play the wrong ballgame over the past four years. Chen has been seeking talks and negotiations with the Chinese authorities since first becoming president in 2000, but to no avail.
In conclusion, I would like to pose a question to pro-China candidates Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜): How do they view China's actions with regard to the A-mei incidents, both in May 2000 and last week's "protests," supposedly by the students?
Jason Lee
Singapore
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations