Clarification requested
Your article ("Many entertain doubts about Paal," June 13, page 3) gravely misrepresented my stance on the special defense budget. You wrote: "The budget serves the US' interest but not necessarily Taiwan's, Hsiao said, and for Lin [Chung-mo], that is difficult to accept."
I was discussing with your reporter Melody Chen my understanding of Legislator Lin's view on the budget, but your choice of words misleads readers into thinking that I hold the same views.
In fact, I believe that weapons procurement is a necessary expenditure for the sake of national security. We in Taiwan must demonstrate a strong commitment to our self-defense and I urge the public and my colleagues in the Legislative Yuan to support the special budget.
Hsiao Bi-khim
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator
Editor's note:
The transcription of the discussion that led our reporter to write the paragraph went like this:
Hsiao: "In Taiwan-US relations, things that serve the US' interest do not necessarily serve Taiwan's. It is difficult for Lin to accept the US' position. I understand Lin's feelings."
The conversation was set in the context of Lin's spat with American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal that stemmed from the defense budget. It would be difficult for the reporter to imagine Hsiao was referring to anything besides the defense budget.
Legal process unfair
On June 3, my employer, Taiwan Colors Music, received notification from the Labor Bureau that my work permit had been cancelled and that I had to leave Taiwan within 14 days. This was unanticipated and shocking. But it was also the culmination of a program of systematic harassment carried out against me by the Taitung police, despite the facts that I have been a legal working resident since 1999 and that I have not been charged with any crime.
The trouble began on April 8 when the Taitung County Culture Bureau sponsored a press conference to publicize a performance series I've been part of (I've both performed in and helped book other artists for the Dulan Organic Music Series, held in a cafe 20km north of Taitung City). The following week, after the event was reported in local media, Taitung Foreign Affairs Police officer Peter Chen (陳允萍) called the cafe manager and threatened that, due to my participation, she was subject to an NT$150,000 fine and I was liable to deportation. Chen claimed that undercover officers had documented my involvement with video footage and photos.
County Culture Bureau Director Lin Yong-fa and the Taitung City mayor intervened on my behalf -- after all, I was unpaid, and the event benefited not only the cafe and the local community but also the bureau and the performers, for whom there is no other original music venue in Taitung.
Chen promised the officials that if I made a formal statement the case would be shelved. At the precinct office I was asked a number of questions relating to my performances without any mention of my right to remain silent or to consult a lawyer. Only when my answers were printed and handed to me did I see from the statement that I was under criminal investiga-tion, and the statement of my legal rights. I protested this omission of due process, but the officers told me I would have "big trouble" if I didn't sign the statement. I signed, but they refused to give me a copy, saying, "You read it, you signed it, you should know what's in it."
Based on that statement the Labor Bureau has convicted me in absentia of violating labor laws. They have revoked my work permit, and, thereby, my residence in Taiwan.
As a writer and musician, my life in Taitung has been far from nefarious. My last CD, Ocean Hieroglyphics, is among other things an expression of the beauty of Taitung's coast, and is distributed internationally by Wind Records. I have done a number of pro bono recordings of Aboriginal elders singing their traditional songs. I write regularly for the alternative Taipei weekly POTS, and several of my essays on the predicament of Taiwan's Aboriginals will be published in an international journal this year. Selections of my poems have recently been published in Chinese translation in Taiwan Poetics.
I am in the process of mounting an appeal. But beyond the outcome of this case, the larger issue at stake for Taiwan is that something is seriously amiss when a foreign affairs police officer baldly lies about law enforcement issues to a foreign resident. The travesty is extended further when the Labor Bureau simply takes that offi-cer's evidence as prima facie that I am a criminal, and when their first step is to revoke my working rights, and thereby my residence, in Taiwan.
Taiwan's efforts to gain a place in the international community are contravened if the police force, as an extension of political authority, uses threats and intimidation to enforce a xenophobic or ladder-climbing agenda, and if the administration does not competently process issues relating to the rights of foreign residents.
One would hope that the police and government agencies of this struggling democracy would do their utmost to support creative expression and cultural exchange, rather than undermine them through narrow-mindedness and antiquated labor laws.
Scott Ezell
Dulan, Taitung County
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under