The purpose of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) is to analyze and predict the effects of construction projects and to evaluate their pros and cons in light of other alternatives. Apart from environmental protection, EIA systems can also be applied to resource management and environmental planning.
For many countries that take an official interest in monitoring limited resources and environmental issues, the EIA system plays vital roles in planning the sustainable use of resources, creating preventive measures against environmental damage and waste, and overall planning and evaluation.
In evaluating investment projects, the function and credibility of EIAs will come under tremendous challenge if short-term benefits and technical feasibility are given priority over long-term hazards and realistic assessment of environmental capacities.
For example, as part of the five-year, NT$500 billion New Ten Major Infrastructure Projects, the Gi-yang artificial reservoir is the only one among the four artificial lakes that passed the initial EIA. The planning of the other three artificial lakes -- Taoyung, Yunling and Tainan lakes -- are still under way. While the Gi-yang artificial reservoir is designed to cover over 1000 hectares and to swallow more than NT$30 billion in the course of its budgeted development, it will provide only 340,000 tons of water daily for Kaohsiung and Pingtung residents.
Yet the 65 million cubic meters of dredged silt from its construction will make tens of billions of dollars in profits for the contractors, absolving them of responsibility to backfill as the Gravel Quarry Law (
Such a huge project sparks doubts that it is the public that benefits from all this.
The Gi-yang project would have multiple negative impacts on the environment. Possible pollution of Pingtung's groundwater reservoir aside, the Gi-yang project might also cause salination of groundwater and coastal erosion by damming the Kaoping River. A multitude of other disputes and alternatives awaits further assessments.
For instance, if we switch 1 percent of water currently used for irrigation to industrial and civil use, this amount will nearly match the volume the Gi-yang reservoir would be able to store. Or, to reduce spending, the government can recycle water from industrial parks and commercial areas and encourage people to conserve water, adjusting water prices when necessary and allowing water prices to reflect costs.
By doing so, the government can save about 70 liters per capita per day and spare all the resources involved in building another artificial reservoir. However, we do not know whether such a non-structural, low-cost and lost-risk project of sustained development has even been considered by government agencies.
Despite the ruling and opposition parties in the Legislative Yuan agreeing to launch EIAs on the four artificial lakes and the Hualien Superhighway projects, we still hope the second-stage EIA to remedy previous mistakes will not simply be a tool to legitimatize and endorse the pro-construction policy.
We expect both the government and the opposition parties to review the controversial projects of the four artificial lakes and Hualien Super-highway in a way that reflects their love for Taiwan and for the land we live on. Taking a more far-sighted perspective, they should reconsider whether the nature of these projects meets the standard of ecological and environmental sustainability.
The questions the government and opposition party should reflect on include: Are such projects addressing a pressing public need, or merely the contractors' interests? Is there other, more reasonable alternatives that allow sustainable resource development? Do the projects' risk and cost analyses also include their environmental and social costs? Is there adequate financing for the project?
If they are not concerned with these matters, the government and the opposition parties will not only rashly endorse the still-unclear effects of the New Ten Major Infrastructure Projects, but also bear the blame for violating the principles of sustainable development and equity between generations. They will win notoriety for depriving children of their share of the nation's resources, and for leaving these debts for the next generation to pay.
For the past four years, the ruling party has proclaimed its intention to develop a "green island of technology," chanting slogans about "loving Taiwan" and "sustainable development." Yet we are let down again and dare not place high hopes on this government.
We only expect the officials responsible to be honest and objective in reviewing the controversial projects of the four artificial lakes and the Hualien Superhighway, to craft policies for sustainable development with determination and vision, and to leave a scenic landscape for our children.
Actions speak louder than words. "Loving Taiwan" should not be an empty slogan in an election campaign but the goal of policies that cherish the land, the people and the sustainable development of Taiwan.
Sue Lin is an environmental engineering professor at National Chengkung University.
TRANSLATED BY WANG HSIAO-WEN
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS