In May, the Formsan Association for Public Affairs, jointly funded by Taiwanese and Americans, lobbied the US House of Representatives to pass a resolution that would call for the dispatch of Taiwanese Marines to Iraq. The move caused an uproar among some members of the public, but then the incident seemed temporarily to come to an end. Meanwhile, a number of incidents that undermined the US-led effort in Iraq were reported in the media.
Let's talk about Michael Jordan's quick exit first. Air Jordan flew through China, Hong Kong and Taiwan to promote Nike basketball shoes. But the basketball great's 90-second appearance here angered fans who had splashed out money for a glimpse of the legendary athlete. From the media reports and messages on the Internet, one can tell that the fury did not result from the American capitalistic imperialism that the Jordan icon embodies.
In fact, it was quite the opposite. What they were angry about was that Jordan spent less time with his Taiwanese fans than with those in China and Hong Kong, relegating them to the status of second-rate victims of America's cultural imperialism. Jordan remains a god to his Taiwanese fans, but the fact that he didn't treat them well is extremely embarrassing.
Another Michael won the Palme d'Or in this year's Canne Film Festival with his latest documentary, Fahrenheit 911. The American documentary director Michael Moore dug into the ugly side of the Bush family in his documentary. After its screening at Cannes, the anti-Bush, anti-war film received a 20-minute standing ovation, the longest ever at Cannes. Before the prize was announced, there were two countries where the film's distribution rights were not being eagerly sought -- the US and Taiwan.
In the US, although Walter Disney's art-house subsidiary, Miramax, had bankrolled the documentary, Disney refused to let the unit distribute it for fear of its political and economic fallout (Moore planed to release the film in the run-up to the US' November election and weaken Bush's bid for the presidency). In Taiwan, the reason is simply the poor box office record of Moore's last documentary, Bowling for Columbine. Even if we put aside Columbine's stinging critique of the gun culture rampant in America, anyone who had seen the film would a give thumbs up to the movie. Sadly, Taiwan's audiences have been force-fed with the pap of Hollywood mainstream movies, and have no taste for such films.
Another interesting piece of news was Taiwanese pop singer Luo Da-you's (
His actions came as a shock. One was shocked that a gadfly singer known for offering a critique of Taiwanese society in the early 1980s even possessed a US passport, although there was no specific political persecution nor need for exile at that time.
The anti-war or anti-American movement is not only an ideological resistance movement but also a contest of language. If we can only bring to bear worn-out vocabularies and tired gestures against the sweet words of American imperialism, then both our governments and those of other countries can simply ignore us. Even those youngsters hanging out in McDonald's and Starbucks near the AIT probably won't even bother to pop their heads out and see what is happening out there.
Kuo Li-hsin is a lecturer at the department of radio and television at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY WANG HSIAO-WEN
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under