The audacity of the pan-blue supporters in their advert on page 5 of the Taipei Times on May 20 was breathtaking.
Apparently, "36 hours before the vote, all independent polls showed [President Chen Shui-bian (
A week before the election, it appeared Lien was probably roughly 2 percent ahead, by no means enough for an opposition candidate to be confident of victory given the swing to the incumbent that often occurs in the last week of election campaigns. There was no real consensus in the polls, with both sides offering conflicting data. One doubts the sophistication of the opinion polling organizations, having had only 10 to 15 years to practice their art. Polls conducted by organizations with decades of experience have been spectacularly wrong in mature democracies.
Apparently, "Underground gambling organizations were offering 2-to-1 odds against [Chen]." The obvious question is, of course, how do they know? This question was answered however when I was told that they know people in underground gambling organizations. No surprise there then. What they appear to have missed is that they have underlined the most plausible explanation for the shooting. Not politics, but money.
Hiding behind the disclaimer "people say," the advert says "you and your camp staged the gunshot incident in a desperate attempt to turn around the election." This is a cowardly attempt to tarnish the DPP's image by using hearsay and Josef Goebbels' theory: "Tell a lie that is big enough, and repeat it often enough, and the whole world will believe it." Given People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) past as head of the Government Information Office, perhaps these tactics are not too surprising. What is surprising is their amateurishness.
These are of course very serious allegations and if they prove to be true, few would disagree that Chen is absolutely not fit to be president. If they prove to be untrue then a humble apology will be in order. To accuse someone of cheating in an election campaign is serious. To accuse someone who has been shot of staging it for personal gain is as serious as it gets.
Fortunately, I was informed by the people I spoke to that an apology would be in order and they simply want the truth. I was not told whether this would be in the form of an equally large advert in the Taipei Times. I was also told that they trusted in [forensic scientist] Henry Lee's investigation. What room this leaves for further investigation is not clear.
The truth about this advert is that it is a cheap attempt at slander through hearsay drawing on dubious and unsubstantiated sources. No references were given to specific polls. For obvious reasons no references were given to the contacts in underground gambling organizations. No details were given of what was meant by "Taiwan's Warren Commission" and no details were given of the advertiser.
Toby Wilsdon
Sanchung
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry