British military planners may be concluding that the only way out of Iraq is to plunge in deeper in the hope of reversing dangerous US missteps.
A looming decision on whether Britain will send a contingent of troops to replace withdrawing Spaniards could lead to a major shift in the balance of power in Iraq, with London eventually assuming control of the entire Shiite south.
This would amount to a major gamble for Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is caught between plunging his country deeper into a costly and unpopular occupation, or watching the occupation fail if heavy-handed US tactics backfire.
"Does Britain want to be sucked even deeper into this crisis? On the other hand, it's becoming increasingly obvious that the Brits are very worried about what the Americans could do," said Tim Ripley, a military analyst at Lancaster University.
"There is a great, great worry about the whole thing completely unravelling if there was a bloodbath ... And the idea that they could take it over and be responsible for the Shiites -- yes, it's a bigger commitment, but it might be safer," Ripley said.
As the main US ally, Britain bore a far greater share of the burden of invading Iraq last
year than it has in occupying the country since.
At its peak during the war to oust former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, Britain's force of 45,000 troops -- its largest deployment in 50 years -- was about one-sixth the size of the US invasion force. Today, Britain's 7,500 troops patrolling Basra are little more than a 20th the size of the US presence.
Much of that slack was taken up by other allies, including Poles, Italians, Spaniards, Bulgarians, Ukrainians, Salvadorans and others, who together outnumber British forces two to one. That has unquestionably cost Britain clout in Baghdad.
Britain patrols Basra, Iraq's comparatively quiet second city in the south, while a Polish-led international force patrols the "south central" zone, the Shiite heartland south of the capital.
Spain's withdrawal and an uprising by Shiite militia have led to worries about the long term viability of the 15-nation Polish-led force.
"That Polish multinational division is slowly unravelling," Ripley said. "The Spanish were part of it. Some of the others who were part of it are either pulling out or thinking of pulling out, or have proved to be militarily ineffective."
Britain is discussing sending troops to replace 1,300 Spaniards withdrawing from the Polish-led division. But experts expect that sooner or later London would probably take over command of the Polish division as other allies peel away.
The Times of London has discussed a possible plan to send over a British-run NATO divisional headquarters from Europe.
Along with Basra, that would give Britain responsibility for the entire Shiite-dominated southern half of Iraq, giving London a more substantial role in what has so far been a US-run occupation.
"Together that's half the country. It's where the British can be most effective," said Colonel Christopher Langton, head of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
"I think the British will feel that if they get into the central-south they are going to have more
influence. The mood here at the moment is that we've got this problem, we've got to look at ways of solving it," he said.
There are already signs of such a shift, most notably the arrival in Baghdad two weeks ago of British Major General John McColl, who set up and commanded a British-led peace force in Kabul after Afghanistan's Taliban rulers were toppled in 2001.
McColl will now take the role of deputy to the US commander in Iraq. Britain's military called his arrival "a slight increase in our representation."
British officers consider the peacekeeping and counterinsurgency tactics needed in southern Iraq to be their forte.
"They are better at it and have more experience than the Americans," said Ellie Goldsworthy, head of the UK Military Studies program at the Royal United Services Institute. "It may be that it's a good thing for the British to extend the area over which they are responsible, because British forces are particularly good at managing these types of situations."
Langton said the belief was now widespread in the British military establishment that heavy-handed US military tactics had made the situation worse by inflaming Iraqi public opinion.
"Nobody wants to criticize the effort the Americans have made, but I think they accept -- and the Americans themselves accept -- that they are constrained by their own doctrine," he said. "US military doctrine is a war-fighting doctrine."
British leaders may hope to persuade the US to exercise more restraint. But the price of influence is boots on the ground, Ripley said.
"By skulking in Basra, in many ways they were seen as being peripheral players. The main event is Baghdad, the Shiite holy places, the center of the country. There
is a logic that says `Get people in because you have more of a say over what goes on,'" he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.