When Chinese television broke media silence on the stealthy visit of North Korean ruler Kim Jong-il, it highlighted comradely ties to show Kim and China's leaders embracing in bear hugs and smiling broadly.
A ream of Xinhua news agency reports that flowed shortly after Kim boarded his private luxury train back to Pyongyang trumpeted 55 years of "good-neighborly" relations.
No country has closer ties with North Korea than China. That much is true.
But these days that's not saying much.
In reality, North Korea and China are communist brothers in little more than name and analysts say relations have been shaken by the international crisis surrounding Pyongyang's nuclear weapons programs.
"Each harbors contempt for the other," said Lee Sung-yoon, a Korea expert at Tufts University in the US.
"The North Korean nuclear threat is a major headache for the Chinese," Lee said.
China worries that a nuclear North could set off a regional arms race and has become increasingly impatient as the crisis has dragged on, with no end in sight despite Beijing's unusually active efforts to find a diplomatic resolution.
The standoff is just the latest in a string of bumps that have strained the relationship that appeared ironclad when China came to North Korea's rescue in the 1950 to 1953 Korean War.
Indeed, ideological differences have dogged ties between the two countries' Communist parties since the founding of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in 1948. Just after that, Kim's father, Kim Il-sung, purged many of his pro-China rivals.
During China's destructive Cultural Revolution of 1966 to 1976, North Korea kept its distance and looked on with superiority.
And Pyongyang blasted Beijing as revisionist after China embarked on economic reforms from the late 1970s.
"Relations are certainly at a low ebb," said Marc Lanteigne, professor of political science at Canada's Dalhousie University.
"Especially in comparison with the Maoist and Dengist eras when both states continuously affirmed their strong relationship with each other," Lanteigne said.
Still a buffer
As sour as ties may have turned, when Beijing strategists crunch the data they conclude that North Korea's existence, and close Chinese relations with Pyongyang, are essential at least for now, analysts say.
A "buffer" school of thought, which sees the North as a cushion between Chinese and US troops in South Korea, remains dominant in Chinese policy-making circles, You Ji, a scholar at the University of New South Wales, said in a recent paper.
"Pyongyang's ill intentions and unpredictable adventurism notwithstanding, North Korea's very existence remains of great strategic value to a China whose worst security nightmare is that of another Korean war," he said.
Although the gulf between their strategic interests is widening as China's fate becomes increasingly linked to the economic and political stability of Asia and the world, an abrupt collapse of impoverished North Korea is not in China's interests.
"The Chinese are in some ways the greatest hostage to North Korea, for in spite of the enormous leverage they have over the needy North Koreans, they cannot exercise it," Lee said.
China is the North's biggest supplier of food and energy aid, but only out of necessity, he said.
"China would rather expend its energies developing its economy and thwarting an imminent collapse of North Korea, which would lead to millions of poor North Korean refugees flooding its border," Lee said.
Another school
Nevertheless, the nuclear crisis has emboldened an opposing school of thought in China that sees North Korea as a threat to stability and, in particular, to the task of reclaiming Taiwan, which Beijing sees as a wayward province.
"China's position on North Korea should not be looked at separately from China's position on Taiwan," said Shin Sang-jin, an expert on North Korea-China relations at Kwangwoon University in Seoul.
A Western military analyst in Beijing said China's military has been undergoing a strategic shift in recent years to focus more resources on Taiwan. The Korean nuclear crisis has been a major distraction from that task since it flared in late 2002, he said.
Pyongyang's missile tests in recent years have sent chills through Japan and South Korea, both lying within range, and have caught the eye of Chinese strategists who have noted that the range encompasses Beijing and probably Shanghai. In the event of war on the Korean Peninsula that would be anathema to China, it may have to take sides once again.
Pyongyang may be forced to ask: "Are you with us or against us?" the military analyst said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.