When China's National People's Congress (NPC) concluded its annual meeting recently, it voted to enshrine protection of human rights and private property in the Constitution. But other major changes in China's development strategies that appear to be taking place have attracted far less notice.
China's current leadership, one year after coming to power, has criticized "the single-minded pursuit of GDP growth" over the past decade and unveiled a new approach to modernization characterized as "balanced, human-centered, and environmentally friendly." The change in priorities -- and the tendency of outsiders to overlook it -- is not difficult to understand.
The world is fascinated by China's economic miracle, but
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
it is much less interested in
the costs associated with the country's 8- to 9-percent annual growth rate in the past 25 years. For instance, the energy consumption of every unit of Chinese industrial output is close to three times the global average.
In may places, the environment has been devastated almost beyond recovery.
Similarly, a recent bestseller,
A Survey of Chinese Peasants, reveals the tremendous human cost of China's modernization drive. The book caught the attention of both the elites and the public with its heart-breaking stories of suffering endured by 900 million farmers and its bold criticism of the government's rural policies.
Little gains
Beyond the glamorous skyscrapers of Beijing, Shanghai, and other urban centers, the majority of Chinese who live in the countryside have gained little from the material progress of the past two decades. On the contrary, the initial benefits that peasants gained from the rural reforms of the late 1970s and early 1980s have disappeared; real income among farmers has dropped in recent years as their production costs rise and agricultural prices decline. In most parts of China, farming can no longer sustain a respectable standard of living.
Most worrying is the ever-growing tax burden placed on the rural population. While average agricultural income grew by 90 percent in the period from 1994 to 1997, the rural tax burden jumped by 800 percent. More than 300 taxes and fees have been imposed on peasants by all levels of government. For example, some townships demand 14 kinds of fees to register a marriage.
Today, a farmer's annual income is only one-sixth of an urban dweller's, but he has to pay three times more in tax. This comes in addition to many other financial burdens exacted at the local level.
Indeed, 25 years of reforms have changed nothing of China's real "one country, two systems" model -- a model that segregates China's urban centers from its agricultural areas, with development of the former realized at the expense of the latter.
If we use what is called the "Gini coefficient" to measure this income gap, with "0" indicating perfect equality of income distribution and "1" meaning perfect inequality, the number for China was 0.454 in 2002. This is an internationally recognized level of "absolute disparity." India, long known for gross disparities between rich and poor, has a
Gini coefficient that has hovered around 0.30 to 0.32 over the past five decades. So today's China is a much less equitable society than India.
A recent study by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences concluded that China's urban-rural income gap is the worst on earth, maybe only slightly better than Zimbabwe. The irony here is that China is widely hailed as a success story, while Zimbabwe is generally viewed as a failed state.
Such an unfair distribution
of wealth based on economic exploitation, social injustice and political exclusion has caused silent but persistent resistance by Chinese peasants. They protest, they petition and they participate in local riots when all other means are exhausted.
Explosive potential
Yet little changes. As a result, the "peasant question" is now threatening social stability and is potentially explosive in a way reminiscent of when former Chinese Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) organized his revolution around peasant disaffection with the rural policies of the Chinese Nationalist Party government of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
In response, Premier Wen Jiabao (
China's government must acknowledge that deep income inequality and rural poverty is no longer exclusively an economic problem, but threatens social peace and political stability. Comprehensive reform is the only way out. Unless China commits to greater political openness, allowing the poor and disadvantaged to voice their concerns, represent themselves and monitor policy implementation, it will continue to be jeopardized by a false and perilous prosperity.
Wenran Jiang (姜聞然), who grew up in China and spent five years on a farm in the early 1970s, is professor of political science at the University of Alberta, Canada.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs