Twenty-five years after the US suffered its worst nuclear accident, the moribund atomic energy industry has begun to show signs of life.
A consortium of seven of the biggest companies in the business, including a division of British Nuclear Fuels, now says it intends to apply for the first license to build a commercial nuclear plant in the US since the near disaster at Three Mile Island.
YUSHA
The consortium has not yet said where it intends to construct the plant, only that it will spend millions of dollars on developing the plans, at the invitation of the government.
A series of mechanical malfunctions and human errors led to a partial core meltdown at the Three Mile Island reactor in Pennsylvania on March 28, 1979, causing it to spew plumes of radioactive gas into the atmosphere. For five days there were fears of catastrophe.
The accident and the anxiety it caused, plus the soaring costs of tighter safety regulations and the availability of cheap, clean natural gas were enough to halt the industry in its tracks. The final orders for new nuclear-fired plants were placed in December of that year. None ordered after 1973 was built.
Government officials say there was no effect on the health of local people from the Three Mile Island accident. The courts agreed: A class action lawsuit brought on behalf of 2,000 people was dismissed in 1996.
But doubts remain. Recent data from the Radiation and Public Health Project, a non-profit organization, suggests otherwise. The group claims infant mortality in the area around the plant increased by 47 percentage in the two years after the accident. It also says that, 25 years on, cancer-related deaths among children under 10 are 30 percentage higher than the national average.
Still, broader sentiment appears in the nuclear industry's favor. Power blackouts such as the one that blanketed the northeastern US last summer, concerns about greenhouse gases from coal-fired plants and the shortage of natural gas that is pushing prices higher have combined to rehabilitate nuclear power. The costs of operating nuclear power plants have fallen.
According to a study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the industry's future will depend upon its ability to argue that nuclear power, which produces no greenhouse emissions, is necessary to fight global warming.
"The principal motivation to reconsider the nuclear option is that nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuel resources does not impair air quality and does not release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere," said John Deutch of MIT.
There are 103 commercial reactors still operating in the US, generating about 20 percentage of the nation's electricity. The US accounts for almost a quarter of the 435 nuclear power reactors in the world. The fleet of reactors in the US is aging, however, and many are now applying for licenses to extend their lives. By the end of this year, a third of the existing plants, built to last for 40 years, will have applied for licenses to continue operating for another 20.
The consortium put together to apply for the new plant is made up of Exelon Nuclear, the largest operator in the US, with 17 reactors; Entergy Nuclear, the second-largest US operator; Constellation Energy; the Southern Company; and EDF International North America, a unit of Electricite de France. General Electric and Westinghouse Electric, a unit of BNFL, are the associated manufacturers.
So far, all they have committed to is spending tens of millions of dollars of their own money as well as cash from the government to design a plant. They hope to submit an application by 2008 and have a decision from the nuclear regulatory commission by 2010.
"To protect consumers against spiking energy prices and for our own national security, we need to maintain fuel diversity in the energy industry," said Chris Crane, president and chief nuclear officer of Exelon Nuclear.
"Nuclear energy is safe, reliable and non-carbon emitting. We must keep the nuclear option open for the future," Crane said.
The licensing system was streamlined in 1992 to allow new plants to be built more quickly, but it has yet to be tested.
A number of utilities have applied for "early site permits," part of the department of energy's program to breathe new life into the industry. Applicant companies have 20 years to decide whether they want to build.
The Bush administration's stalled energy bill provides incentives for nuclear power and seeks the extension of liability against lawsuits in case of accidents. The administration is eager to lessen the US' reliance on other countries for its energy needs, particularly nations in the Middle East.
The industry cites statistics that it claims shows reactors are safer than they have ever been. The number of "scrams" -- emergency shutdowns -- has fallen from 1.6 for each plant annually in 1990 to 0.4 in 2002.
But there have been worrying incidents. The Davis Beese plant in Ohio run by FirstEnergy has been closed since early 2002 after it was discovered that an accumulation of acid had almost eaten through the six-inch steel reactor vessel.
Two other obstacles loom large. The first is what to do with nuclear waste. The second is what would happen if plants were targeted by terrorists.
The government is developing a plan to bury nuclear waste at Yucca mountain in Nevada, 150km northwest of Las Vegas, but faces opposition from nearby residents. The concerns don't stop there.
Moving waste across the country on trains is a security risk.
New York residents note that one of the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center in 2001 flew directly over the Indian Point plant on the Hudson river, 56km from midtown Manhattan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.