As the EU prepares to open its new extension it might care to look at the cracks in the front wall.
Countries across the eurozone are struggling with their public finances, high unemployment and voters unwilling to accept painful structural reforms of their social welfare networks and labor markets designed to make their economies more flexible.
Take France. Last month, French President Jacques Chirac was forced to reshuffle his Cabinet after voters gave his party a bloody nose at the polls because they disliked the Raffarin government's reform program.
The outcome of the vote was summed up by business newspaper Les Echos the morning after the elections: "Here we have a situation of a country that must reform and a public opinion which refuses to do so."
Chirac's decision to keep Raffarin as prime minister and bring in Nicolas Sakorsy as his finance minister seems to have more to do with politics than with getting the reform program on track.
Raffarin will serve as a lightning conductor for further unpopularity while Sakorsy, the most dangerous challenger to Chirac on the right, has been given the job most likely to dent his electoral appeal.
The position is little better across the Rhine, although German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder managed to get a watered-down version of his Agenda 2010 reform program on the statute books last year.
But as Deutsche Bank economists Norbert Walter and Ulrich Schroeder noted in a paper for the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies in the late autumn: "In view of the deep-seated weakness in growth, the Agenda falls short of the mark.
Domestic growth
"Agenda 2010 will not bring the hoped-for and urgently needed boost to domestic growth along with a strong revival of the economy by 2004. For the time being, Germany will continue to trail in the wake of the world economy," they said.
Add the fact that Schroeder had to threaten to resign to get his program through, and it is clear there is unlikely to be much appetite for further reform.
This shortfall could have serious consequences. France and Germany have been busting the rules of the stability and growth pact.
Critics have argued that deficit busting -- and lower interest rates -- is no substitute for the sort of serious structural economic reform that voters find so unpalatable.
The new Spanish government may be causing a few flutterings in both Frankfurt and Brussels, even though Pedro Solbes, the European Commission's monetary affairs commissioner and a respected former Spanish finance minister, is to return to his old job in Madrid. Just after the election, a senior Socialist party official indicated that the budget discipline projected by the departing Popular party might be heading for the waste bin under the new regime.
Instead of a balanced budget this year and small surpluses in the following two, as Spain should be creating under the terms of the stability and growth pact, the Socialist party's political secretary hinted that in the first couple of years the Socialists would be prepared to see Spain's finances go back into the red.
Budget busting
If that were not bad enough, Dutch Finance Minister Gerrit Zalm -- who has been one of the strongest critics of those countries that have failed to keep their deficits below the 3 percent laid down by the pact -- had to admit that the Netherlands, too, had fallen victim to budget busting. Although Holland is promising to be good this year, its moral authority in urging others to set their fiscal houses in order has been undermined.
Then there is Greece, where the budget spending gap is set to soar -- officially to 2.9 percent -- this year. That is within the pact rules, but in a year when it is spending money on the preparations for the Olympic games there are concerns it will not be able to stay below 3 percent.
Italy has hit the magic mark in recent times, but only through a series of one-off actions, which has drawn the displeasure of Brussels.
The officials may be dusting off the welcome mat to greet next month's entrants to the EU -- but in reality it is time to call in the structural engineers to inspect the foundations.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.