The pan-blue post-election effort to reverse the voters' decision has stumbled badly over the issue of the attack on President Chen Shui-bian (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Lee dispatched three experts to visit the crime scene, review the evidence, interview witnesses and check out the Criminal Investigations Bureau and Tainan prosecutors' investigative efforts.
The team did all that and more, even obtaining permission to examine Chen's wound.
Their conclusion: Chen and Lu indeed appear to have been shot on March 19, and at the time that cameras and witnesses suggest they were shot. One of the experts, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Coroner Cyril Wecht -- who was highly critical of the controversial Warren Commission investigation of the 1963 assassination of former US president John Kennedy -- said: "Everything is completely consistent -- no discrepancies, nothing strange." He said that the president's wound "is completely consistent with a gunshot wound," and added that the investigation of the incident was being conducted in a "completely open way -- not the way it was done in 1963 in America."
If that is the case, and given who invited Wecht and his colleagues into this investigation in the first place (a point not mentioned in most media reports), one has to wonder at Lien and Soong's further demands. Why the need for another "independent" investigation of the shootings if the current investigation is being done openly and handled well according to their own experts?
Meanwhile, if the investigation so far suggests that the shooting was a genuine attack on the president and vice president, how on earth can the pan-blue team claim, as they are now doing, that the decision to put the military and police around the country on alert was simply a political scheme to keep soldiers and cops from voting? I would argue that had the government not put the military and police on some kind of higher alert status following the attack, it would have been at best derelict, and at worst, open to the suspicion that somebody knew the shootings were bogus.
I can state with some confidence that if the president and vice president of the US were shot and wounded at the same time, and if the perpetrators were not immediately caught, the US would be on a high state of alert. (Why do people think US Vice President Dick Cheney has spent most of his time since Sept. 11 in hiding?)
Certainly there are questions that should be answered: Who came up with the foolish idea of having Chen and Lu repeatedly appear in public together? And who could have come up with the equally foolish idea of having them ride down crowded streets in an open jeep?
But at this point, continuing to charge that the shootings may have been staged, as the pan-blue leaders are doing, is nothing but dangerous demagoguery.
A recount in such a close election, carefully monitored and openly done under court supervision, makes absolute sense.
As for the rest of the pan-blue demands, charges and insinuations, they should be seen clearly for what they are -- the desperate ploy of people who have lost but won't admit it.
Dave Lindorff is a Fulbright Senior Scholar in residence at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under