One of the first official acts of US President George W. Bush's administration was to downgrade the office of national coordinator for counterterrorism on the National Security Council -- a position held by Richard Clarke. Clarke had served in the Pentagon and State Department under former US presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, and was the first person to hold the counterterrorism job created by former US president Bill Clinton. Under Clinton, he was elevated to Cabinet rank, which gave him a seat at the principals' meeting, the highest decision-making group for national security.
By removing Clarke from the table, Bush put him in a box where he could speak only when spoken to. No longer would his memos go to the president; instead, they had to pass though a chain of command of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and her deputy, Stephen Hadley, who bounced each of them back.
Terrorism was a Clinton issue: "soft" and obscure, having something to do with "globalization" and other trends ridiculed from the Republican Party platform.
"In January 2001 the new administration really thought Clinton's recommendation that eliminating al-Qaeda be one of their highest priorities, well, rather odd, like so many of the Clinton administration's actions, from their perspective," Clarke writes in his new book, Against All Enemies.
When Clarke first met Rice and immediately raised the question of dealing with al-Qaeda, she "gave me the impression she had never heard the term before."
The controversy raging around Clarke's book and his testimony before the Sept. 11 commission that Bush ignored warnings about terrorism that might have prevented the attacks revolves around his singularly unimpeachable credibility. In response, Bush has launched an offensive against him, impugning his personal motives, saying he is a disappointed job-hunter, publicity-mad, a political partisan, ignorant, irrelevant -- and a liar.
Clarke's reputation in the Clinton White House was that he could be brusque and passionate, but also calm and single-minded. He was a complete professional, who was a master of the bureaucracy. He didn't suffer fools gladly, stood up to superiors and didn't care whom he alienated. His flaw was his indispensable virtue: He was direct and candid in telling the unvarnished truth.
Counterterrorism
But his account need not stand on his reputation alone. Clarke was not the only national security professional who spanned both the Clinton and Bush administrations. General Donald Kerrick served as deputy national security adviser under Clinton and remained on the National Security Council into the Bush administration. He wrote his replacement, Stephen Hadley, a two-page memo.
"It was classified," Kerrick told me. "I said they needed to pay attention to al-Qaeda and counterterrorism. I said we were going to be struck again. They never once asked me a question, nor did I see them having a serious discussion about it ..."
"I agree with Dick that they saw those problems through an Iraqi prism. But the evidence, the intelligence, wasn't there," he said.
Rice now claims about terrorism that "we were at battle stations." But Bush is quoted by Bob Woodward in Bush At War as saying that before Sept. 11, "I was not on point... I didn't feel that sense of urgency."
Vice President Dick Cheney alleges that Clarke was "out of the loop." But if he was, then the administration was either running a rogue operation or doing nothing, as Clarke testifies.
Bush protests now, "And had my administration had any information that terrorists were going to attack New York City on Sept. 11, we would have acted."
But he had plenty of information. The former deputy attorney general, Jamie Gorelick, the only member of the Sept. 11 commission to read the president's daily brief, revealed in the hearings that the documents "would set your hair on fire" and that the intelligence warnings of al-Qaeda attacks "plateaued at a spike level for months" before Sept. 11. Bush is fighting public release of these briefings, which would show whether he had marked them up and demanded action.
The administration's furious response to Clarke only underscores his book. Rice is vague, forgetful and dissembling. Cheney is belligerent, certain and bluffing. In Clarke's account, as in the memoir of former secretary of the treasury Paul O'Neill, Bush is disengaged, incurious, manipulated by those in the circle around him; he adopts ill-conceived strategies that he has played little or no part in preparing. Bush is the Oz behind the curtain, but unlike the wizard, the special effects are performed by others. Especially on terrorism and Sept.11, his White House is at "battle stations" to prevent the curtain from being pulled open.
Sidney Blumenthal, former senior adviser to president Bill Clinton, is the Washington bureau chief of Salon.com and the author of The Clinton Wars.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under