History has shown that democracy functions best when instituted from within. Our contemporary affairs on the international arena further emphasize this point.
Iraq struggles on a day-to-day basis, failing to secure the delicate balance between freedom, order and equality. In Afghanistan, democratically elected President Hamid Karzai's electoral legitimacy hardly reaches beyond the borders of Kabul, and due to security, his presence merely extends to the fringes of the presidential compound.
I applaud the efforts of the US government to expand
the democratic principles we enjoy as American citizens, but if we are the leader of the free world, democracy construction projects should not be limited to countries that have yet to take the first step toward self-governance.
Though not exactly struggling between freedom and oppression, Taiwan is arrested midway in its democratic development.
The truth is that, as US administrator Paul Bremer stated, that there can be no freedom without security. Security assurance is necessary to assist states in transition. This is especially true for Taiwan, which is in a class of its own, and could use that benefit to attain true democracy.
Taiwan deserves the US' help in defending a true democracy. Unlike Palestine, friction between ethnic groups does not inspire violence
or terrorism, but instead encourages representatives to settle matters in a legislature. Unlike Chechnya, the people of Taiwan have not resorted to
violence to communicate their cause, but believe self-governing principles of the citizens' consent authorize sovereignty. Unlike Kurdish areas in Iraq, Taiwanese society has developed an economic infrastructure that yielded a 2.9-percent GDP growth last year, whereas the US grew at 2.3 percent.
Ironically, the only issue some might be uneasy with is Taiwan's over-emulation of the US' government and political process. The constitutions of both countries are fundamentally identical: A bill of rights protects the citizens and branches of government separate powers to check and balance each other. Some may even find it amusing that the free press in Taiwan, like in the US, provides political candidates with an effective venue
to sling mud and hurl negative ads. Campaigns are also about horserace politics and trivially focus on scandals rather than the issues, a feature Americans are familiar with. Finally, here's the kicker -- the last election, just a week ago, featured disputed ballots where voter intentions were unclear, followed by the losing candidate suing for a recount.
If Taiwan is politically and socially a Massachusetts-sized version of the US with a population of 23 million, what more does the nation need for sovereign affirmation? Answer: security.
Around 500 missiles from the world's largest country are an effective way to inspire voter apathy or constitute a persuasive retort to foreign policy negotiations.
How can election results be legitimate if people vote in fear for their lives rather than for the general welfare of society? Needless to say, until Taiwan's electorate is free to vote its conscience, it will never really taste self-government.
Unlike the Taiwanese government, the US controls the largest military budget in the world and an unparalleled military ready take on any state or non-state organization wishing to scare voters headed for the polls.
If the US government is indeed an advocate of freedom, then our leaders shall not only plant seeds of democracy in the Middle East and central Asia but should also cultivate democracy in Taiwan. Taiwan needs the umbrella of security against Chinese missiles in order to function as a free and open society. There is no need to draft a constitution, rebuild the nation or deal with anti-US sentiment -- just a foreign policy consistent with US values.
History will judge the US harshly if it stands idle while a communist country with the world's largest standing army invades a full-fledged democracy without a realistic chance of defending itself.
Whoever the leader of the US is at the time of such a crisis should look at the situation and see a struggle between freedom and oppression. He or she should not look at China and see only the lucrative opportunities of the world's largest market and a chance to appease investors who contribute to political campaigns.
The US' interests will conflict with China's sooner or later, and it will only be a matter of time before the US$124 billion trade deficit spirals out of control. China's military budget will eventually surpass that of the US -- its moon program was funded entirely by the military.
Presently, the issue of democracy in Taiwan is swept under the rug while business and politicians rush to carve and develop China's markets. Procrastinate as US leaders might, ultimately the US will have to choose between fleeting financial gains for the political present or forgoing trade and promoting US values of democracy.
Regardless of what happens, future generations will hold decision-makers of today accountable for freedom and rights, and for this reason I urge US leaders to uphold the ideals that the US is founded upon.
Mark Du
United States
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.