March has been a month of mixed messages. In the same week that Libya followed through on a historic commitment to dismantle its nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs, terrorists struck in the heart of Europe, with tragic consequences for the people of Spain.
In this confusing time of terrible dangers and unusual opportunities, one thing is clear: the United States needs the force of diplomacy to win at peace just as much as we need the force at arms to win at war. Iraq is certainly a case in point.
A year into Operation Iraqi Freedom, we know what it will take to win the peace. It will take international engagement and a sustained commitment to the people of Iraq. Fortunately, that is precisely the strategy of President George W. Bush.
Success may seem a tall order, however, given the nearly daily news of shootings and roadside bombs. Unfortunately, in the 21st century, war and peace no longer appear to be sequential. Winning battles and winning hearts and minds -- the force at arms and the force of diplomacy -- increasingly have become joint operations.
That is why the US will stay the course in Iraq, and we are in good company. Today there are 24,500 soldiers from 34 countries standing alongside our own soldiers. There are scores of nations involved in reconstruction efforts, which have committed billions in donations and in-kind services. The UN is also involved. Since May 2003, the UN Security Council has passed four Resolutions, which have established a comprehensive framework for international participation and progress. These Resolutions have also paved the way for more UN involvement.
There will continue to be significant challenges in Iraq, but the world's investment of resources and attention is paying off. Today, a new government is forming, a stronger economy is growing, and the security situation is improving.
On March 8, the Iraqi Governing Council signed a very important document, the Transitional Administrative Law (TAL). The TAL establishes a sovereign Iraqi government, which will govern the country from July of this year until elections are held in 2005. The TAL also reads as a statement of intent for the future, committing to a government that is republican, federal, democratic, and pluralistic; civilian control of the military; guaranteed participation of women; and sweeping protections for the rights of all Iraqis. And while the separation of church and state is a very important concept in western democracies, this will not be a western democracy. Drawing on Islam as one source of law is appropriate.
Of course, such promising political development is unlikely to take root without a better economy. Reconstruction needs in Iraq are enormous. Prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom, those lucky enough to live in Saddam Hussein's hometown or near one of his palaces may have enjoyed a certain standard of services. For the rest of Iraq, shortages of everything from electricity to schoolbooks were common.
In that sad context, the Coalition Provisional Authority has made great progress. Working with a mix of US government agencies, private contractors, and Iraqis, they have retrofitted decrepit power and sewage treatment plants, which already surpass prewar output and reliability. They have renovated and reopened the port of Umm Qasr and the Baghdad International Airport, repaired oil facilities and expanded the communications infrastructure. They have vaccinated some 3 million toddlers, distributed almost 9 million schoolbooks, and created jobs for nearly a half-million Iraqis. That is especially important in a country where unemployment and underemployment, by some estimates, nears 50 percent.
Political and economic recovery is without question essential for Iraq, but it will be very difficult to lock in these gains without an improvement in the security situation. For that reason, the US and international military forces will remain in the country. The Department of Defense will also continue to train an Iraqi Military Force, with an ambitious goal of a 40,000-man force by the end of the year. At the same time, the State Department is recruiting and training separate law enforcement forces. The CPA is also dealing with millions of landmines and the conversion of unconventional weapons programs and dual-use facilities to peaceful, civilian missions.
Indeed, the Coalition Provisional Authority under Ambassador Jerry Bremer's able leadership has undertaken an impressive body of work. That work will continue long beyond the lifetime of the Provisional Authority itself, which will cease to exist at the end of June. At that point, the Iraqi Interim Government will assume full sovereignty and the United States will open a diplomatic mission in Baghdad, the largest US mission in the world.
Iraq is an important battlefield in the effort to eliminate the threat of terrorism and establish peace in the Middle East. Clearly, success in Iraq and winning the war on terror will also require the force of diplomacy. The exit strategy in both this battle and the wider war is to win the peace, a goal that can only be met through the sustained engagement of the international community and the leadership of the US.
Richard Armitage is the US deputy secretary of state. The text of this article was provided by the American Institute in Taiwan.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations