Taipei Times: The first-ever referendum in Taiwan failed to pass, with only 45.17 and 45.12 percent of the electorate voting for each question, rendering the controversial ballot invalid. What message do you think this sends to the international community?
Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政): It shows that the pan-blue camp's boycott of the referendum was successful. A lot of people in Taiwan still make their decisions based on what is advocated by their preferred political party.
However a significant number of people did cast their votes in the referendum, and combined with President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) winning his re-election bid, the significance of the referendum voting should not be overlooked either.
Chen's winning re-election has given him a general mandate to carry out his cross-strait policies. The referendum would have given him a more specific mandate, had it been valid.
If the referendum had been valid, this would have been a positive and clear message to both the US and China that we have the will and resolve to defend ourselves against China's missile threats. But because not enough people voted in the referendum to make the results valid, the message that the referendum could have sent was weakened.
TT: Both support for and opposition to the referendum within Taiwan has been strong. How do you think the international media perceive the referendum in Taiwan? Do they see it as a necessary step toward democracy or do they see it as electioneering?
Lo: Most international media have interpreted the referendum in Taiwan as electioneering. So even with the referendum failing to pass, the international community and media are happy to downplay this first failure.
The opposition has criticized Chen for linking the referendum to the election. But just because the referendum is motivated by political motives doesn't make it dirty. I think that democratic countries should be able to appreciate the pressure to get re-elected an incumbent is under.
TT: The referendum was preceded by an attempt to assassinate the president. How do you think this will affect the international community's view of Taiwan's referendum and election?
Lo: First, both candidates had a responsibility to calm their supporters. Both Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Lien Chan's (連戰) campaign staff and Chen's staff came out publicly to ask their supporters to remain calm and accept the election results.
That was the one thing that both candidates could have done to prevent a possibly bad impression of Taiwan's election.
TT: On the topic of cross-strait relations, do you think this referendum will change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait?
Lo: The term "status quo" is misleading. What is the "status quo" that everyone is referring to? China has been deploying its missiles for the last 10 years. Is that the status quo that we would like to maintain -- the increasing rate at which the number of missiles are targeted at us?
I think the referendum was trying to redress the imbalance in the Strait and was aiming to take the status quo back to when there were no missiles. It also points out that this status quo is unfavorable to Taiwan. It helps to point out the imbalance to the international community. Many countries in the world don't know that Taiwan is being targeted by hundreds of missiles.
The status quo is not the same as stability.
In fact, the status quo of China continually increasing the number of missiles targeted at us is destabilizing.
TT: Do you think the referendum topics address the sovereignty issue, as was suggested in the debates leading up to the referendum?
Lo: I think executing the referendum is itself a manifestation of sovereignty. It didn't need more specific wording to emphasize that we have sovereignty in engaging in talks with China.
TT: Do you think the relationship between the US and Taiwan has been damaged in the last few months?
Lo: The US administration was quite negative regarding Taiwan's referendum in the beginning, but it softened its tone, and its opposition to unilateral changes has been directed not only toward Taiwan but also toward China. But trust will have to be won back now.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry