The dust has settled following the debate about voting and vote-counting procedures for the upcoming referendum and the debate about the referendum questions has formally begun.
The biggest issue now is the great difference in attitudes between political camps. In particular, the declaration by a certain presidential ticket that they intend not to vote in the referendum brought another force into play. It now seems voting has become equated with support for the green presidential ticket and vice versa, regardless of whether one supports or opposes the referendum questions.
The result of the referendum is, in fact, irrelevant to the question of who will win the presidential election. Purely as a result of political manipulation, a "political mobilization" aspect is now attached to a decision to vote, thus diminishing the referendum's significance as a means for the people to express their free will.
This development is, in a way, a reflection of Taiwan's "ideology trap" -- any public issue is easily politicized and one's political stance is used to simplify and smear certain opinions. Regret-tably, those most frequently caught in this trap are scholars and cultural and media workers who see themselves as belonging to society's elite. Slipping away from mainstream public sentiment, they block social advancement.
Take the referendum, for example. While not openly speaking out against it, former members of the Council of Grand Justices and legal and political scholars from the authoritarian era have tried hard to fabricate reasons to support the blue camp's suggestion to refuse to vote, thus proving German sociologist Karl Mannheim's standard definition of ideology: Ideology is a thought model that distorts the truth because the truth does not coincide with individual or group interests.
So how do we determine truth? The 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally produced an unprecedented voluntary turnout. But if so successful a mass movement is denigrated as "populist" by scholars, then they are distorting the truth to suit their own prejudices. Further, if a majority of the people believe the wish for peace and opposition to China's missiles are the issues on which they most want to make their voices heard, then the referendum is probably the most peaceful way of expressing this wish through direct democratic means.
The reaction by the "elite" is, in fact, not surprising. Beginning during the martial law era, this group has constantly looked down on popular free will. Using their monopoly on discourse and media, they have repeatedly forced their own ideology onto the public. Although this was quite effective under the party-state system, the people, transformed into citizens and free people with equal rights, are now leading the elite as Taiwanese democracy is maturing.
By comparison, the old ruling class is incapable of casting off the curse of ideology and, becoming "unfree" and unaware, it seems they are attempting a last effort before their final collapse by intimidating voters into relinquishing their right to participate in the referendum.
As we break down the evil influence of ideology, we understand that all free people should vote in the referendum to collectively exercise further hard-won civic rights and fight together to win freedom from fear, the most legitimate of God-given human rights.
All free people should stand up, calmly and peacefully, and vote in the referendum. It is their individual freedom to decide whether to agree with or oppose the referendum questions, but by deciding not to vote, they are squandering their new-found status as free people and citizens.
Ku Chung-hwa is a professor of sociology at National Chengchi University and chairman of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under