Only in an election year would US politicians try to pin unemployment on India.
Not that the blame game stops there. Republicans and Democrats alike argue China has stolen US jobs, and unfair trade is a favorite target on the campaign trail, where protectionist sentiment appeals to jobless voters -- much to the dismay of cooler-headed economic policy-makers.
Democratic White House hopeful Senator John Kerry points the finger at "Benedict Arnold" executives who outsource jobs to countries where labor is cheaper, while rival Senator John Edwards castigates free trade agreements in general for hurting US workers.
Republicans, struggling to explain the loss of 2.2 million jobs since US President George W. Bush took office, joined Democrats in their rebuke of White House economic adviser Gregory Mankiw last month for suggesting outsourcing probably was "a plus for the economy in the long run."
The fury over Mankiw's open declaration of what many consider a core tenet of economics -- that a free flow of goods and services benefits consumers over time by lowering prices -- sent a ripple of self-censorship through political circles. This is not the year to muse about the benefits of free trade.
"These days it has become politically incorrect to say certain things -- even if everyone recognizes them to be correct," Dallas Federal Reserve president Robert McTeer said after the Mankiw fuss, likening the topic to the electrified "third rail" that kills unwary subway trespassers.
Even administration officials -- who have signed a raft of free trade deals since taking power -- are spooked, with one ducking trade-related interviews for fear, in the words of an aide, of "pulling a Mankiw."
The perfect storm of an impending election, sluggish jobs recovery and structural change -- in which workers are pushed out of dying industries to new or growing sectors -- has fueled the backlash against outsourcing, with mainstream media bringing multi-part investigative series on the issue into American living rooms.
"There's no question that this would not be as much of an issue if it was the first year of a presidential term instead of the last year," said Catherine Mann, an economist at the nonprofit, nonpartisan Institute for International Economics in Washington.
Moreover, with the shift of jobs offshore now affecting not just manufacturing workers but also white-collar, high-tech and service-sector employees, politicians of all stripes are calling for "fair trade" rather than "free trade."
While one anti-outsourcing bill -- a Republican amendment signed by Bush in January -- has so far been passed, the non-partisan National Foundation for Economic Policy (NEEP) has tracked more than 40 bills at the state and federal level aimed at preventing foreigners from winning government contracts.
NFEP executive director Stuart Anderson said legislative attempts to block the jobs shift will likely increase, if only because it is easier for politicians to blame foreigners for job losses than to explain the vagaries of productivity, structural changes and the business cycle.
"Whether you blame India or China or trade agreements, it's certainly convenient. It's a bumper sticker versus a paragraph," Anderson said. "But blaming people in other countries is a populist attempt for votes that sometimes can border on irresponsible."
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan -- who is appointed, not elected -- has been one of the few prominent officials to warn against attacks on free trade, saying more attention should be paid to boosting the skills of American workers to prepare them for the jobs of the future.
While acknowledging the pain inflicted by the outsourcing trend, Greenspan said it had opened a worrying chasm between those hurt by the phenomenon and economists who back the benefits of trade liberalization.
"It is crucial that this gulf be bridged," Greenspan said. "Protectionism will do little to create jobs; and if foreigners retaliate, we will surely lose jobs."
Still, Mann believes political rhetoric may cool once the campaign spotlight dims, as lawmakers -- already struggling with tight budgets -- tally the cost of paying US workers to provide work that can be done much more cheaply overseas.
"When people start to cost out some of these restrictions, the legislation quietly goes away," Mann said.
Besides, she argued, all the attention might just prompt politicians to begin the painful task of reshaping the US workforce for the future -- a process that will require big changes in education and retraining programs.
"Some of these issues may have sound-bite material in them, but public policy isn't made by sound bites," Mann said. "Public policy often needs a serious nudge to get done ... the New Deal didn't happen in a period of economic abundance."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under