Whether the Chinese yuan should appreciate has become a hot international issue. One of the reasons for this is that China is sitting on an enormous foreign exchange reserve worth more than US$400 billion, second only to Japan's US$600 billion forex reserve.
Foreign exchange usually comes from two sources: trade surplus and net foreign investment. China's trade surplus with the US reached US$103 billion last year and it is predicted to reach US$130 billion this year. Beijing's deliberate measures to keep the yuan weak are believed to be the main cause of the massive trade surplus.
We can understand something about the massive flow of foreign investment into China from an expression used in recent years to describe the appeal of the Chinese market: the "capital magnet" effect.
As foreign money flows into the Chinese market and has to be exchanged to yuan before circulating there, the demand for the yuan naturally increases. In a free market, the price of the yuan would see an increase based upon the simple principle of supply and demand. However, the Beijing authorities suppress the price. As a result, large amounts of yuan have accumulated in China. This currency circulates in the form of idle money, causing currency or asset inflation (that is, speculative bubbles in the real estate or stock markets).
This was painfully experienced in Taiwan in the 1980s. So, what really happened in Taiwan at that time?
As described by the late Academia Sinica member Hsing Mu-huan (邢慕寰), the value of the New Taiwan dollar was kept at NT$40 to US$1 until 1986. This serious undervaluation served
as an invisible export subsidy. Together with tax returns from raw materials exports, this led to an abnormal increase in the trade surplus and in foreign exchange. Two grave consequences followed from this.
First, technology ceased to grow. Second, the flood of idle money led to potential inflation, speculation in the real estate and the stock markets and gambling.
More serious, the West's industrialized nations were given a good excuse to force Taiwan to open its markets and revalue its currency. When the NT dollar suddenly appreciated considerably, most small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) were unable to sustain themselves and serious unemployment was the result.
The initial reason for not revaluing the NT dollar was to protect export-oriented SMEs. Nevertheless, revaluation -- and excessive revaluation at that -- eventually became inevitable, and many SMEs that could have survived a steady revaluation policy went bankrupt.
Beginning in 1985, Taiwan saw a sharp surge in foreign exchange assets, and speculation ran wild for a time until the stock market plunged and the bubble burst in 1990, the impact of which can still be felt in Taiwan today.
Will this happen to China too?
Today's China is very similar to Taiwan's situation in the early 1980s. What's worse, production volume and value growth rates in China are often inflated and
the money supply has doubled, while the accumulation of foreign exchange reserves is leading to an increasing demand for the yuan.
Combining these two factors, the problem with the flood of idle money is even worse than it was in Taiwan 20 years ago. Once the inflated demand collapses, the consequences will be grave, and the impact on the global economy unimaginable. Therefore, for the good of the world, the Chinese authorities need to liberalize their foreign exchange market soon.
Wu Hui-lin is a research fellow at the Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under