It may sound paradoxical but the victory of conservatives in Iran's widely decried parliamentary election might just open the way for a rapprochement between the Islamic Republic and the US after 25 years of enmity.
Washington and the EU both criticized the poll after an unelected hardline clerical body barred 2,500 mainly reformist candidates, including 80 sitting lawmakers, from standing, guaranteeing a conservative victory.
But Western diplomats acknowledge that promoting democracy is not their top priority with Iran.
They need a united government able to deliver results on an array of pressing concerns, such as Iran's nuclear program, its stance on detained al-Qaeda Islamic militants, its role in Iraq and Afghanistan and support for groups hostile to Israel.
Iranian and Western officials say the fierce power struggle between reformists backing President Mohammad Khatami and hardliners under the mantle of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has hampered progress in recent years.
Khatami was able to ease tensions with Iran's neighbors and boost relations with European countries, projecting a gentler and more democratic image of Iran. But he lacked the authority to strike a grand bargain with Washington.
"My forecast is that the strategy of detente in foreign relations should be continued, maybe faster than before because the system has more trust in the new people in parliament," influential conservative commentator Amir Mohebian said.
He said Iran had seen some positive signals from the US but not yet sufficient to move forward.
The conservative winners of last week's election say they are prepared to deal with the US if it makes the first move by recognizing the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic.
Ahmad Tavakoli, one of the leaders of the main conservative list, said the US kept setting preconditions and using an accusatory tone. It should start by freeing billions of dollars in Iranian assets frozen since 1980, he said.
Mohebian believes a grand bargain based on mutual interest and mutual benefit is possible between Tehran and Washington.
Both countries share an interest in stabilizing Iraq and Afghanistan, where US diplomats acknowledge privately Iran has played a generally constructive role.
Diplomats say exploratory talks, denied by both sides, have been going on for months in New York and Geneva.
The key point man is Iran's UN ambassador Mohammad Javad Zarif, a US-educated political scientist whose connections in Tehran straddle all factions.
Zarif was finally allowed to visit Washington last month and a group of congressional staff was invited to Iran, although the trip was later postponed by Iran.
A senior Western diplomat said the contacts were making little headway as neither party had a real negotiating mandate.
Both sides must first resolve difficult internal debates over whether to restore ties, and neither is in a hurry because of the domestic political calendar.
The US is unlikely to take a strategic decision on whether to seek a Libya-style accommodation with Iran or tighten its policy of isolation until after the US presidential election in November, said Judith Yaphe, an expert on Iran and Iraq at Washington's National Defense University.
And Iran's conservatives may well wait until they have completed their reconquest of all the institutions of power in a presidential election in May 2005 before weighing a deal.
In both countries there are determined adversaries of any end to 25 years of confrontation.
A senior Iranian official said Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei believes the Islamic Republic needs an ugly American enemy, but several of his advisers advocate rapprochement.
In Washington, influential neo-conservatives such as Defense Policy Advisory Board member Richard Perle, virulently oppose any dealing with this Iranian government and advocate a policy of regime change, not by force but by subversion.
Tehran diplomats say neo-conservative suggestions that the Islamic system is on the brink of collapse are wishful thinking.
On the Iranian side, there is a widespread failure to grasp the political realities of Washington, which leads to what the diplomats call an inflated view of Iran's bargaining position.
Mahmoud Sariolghalam, professor of international relations at Shahid Beheshti National University, says some top Iranians believe they can develop far-reaching relations with the EU without dealing with the US.
"The Europeans can go only so far without US normalization," he said in an interview.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry