Three social elites -- Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲), Cloud Gate Dance Theater founder Lin Hwai-min (林懷民) and Formosa Plastics Group chairman Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) -- published a "solemn statement" regarding the presidential election in a front-page newspaper advertisement in mid-January.
Unfortunately, some media intentionally misrepresented the ad as a condemnation of negative campaigning meant to protect the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-People First Party alliance from its troubles with the issue of party and private assets.
But is negative campaigning necessarily bad for an election campaign that has no positive meaning?
Campaign attacks are carried out in two ways.
The first is called image attack -- for example, attacking the KMT's corruption and the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) pro-Taiwan independence stance, as well as calling other candidates feeble, corrupt or capricious. An image attack is usually made up of accusations against personal characteristics, made to entrench voters' preconceived ideas.
The second type is called issue attack -- attacking opponents' political accomplishments or policies or stances on specific issues. Examples of this are the KMT's criticism of the DPP's referendum proposal and the latter's criticism of the former's party assets.
The accusations in such negative ads have clarified various problems, and have made parties and their candidates unable to hide, echoing the social elite's call for resuming "rationality and clearness."
Through the KMT's attacks, we can think over the meaning and necessity of holding a preventive referendum on election day.
Through the DPP's attacks, we can understand how the KMT inappropriately obtained national assets that originally belonged to the people.
Through the attacks of both, we can have a clear picture of the two presidential candidates' wealth.
The quantity of their wealth is not the key point. What matters is whether illegitimate conduct occurred.
In addition, through a comparison of the negative ads in this election and in the previous presidential election, perhaps voters can also see the drastic changes in the attitudes of some politicians.
Thanks to negative ads, voters are able to view the two candidates more rationally.
Elections are always accompanied by negative campaigning. During the 1998 Taipei mayoral election campaign, the KMT's Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) attacked President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who was Taipei mayor at the time, with negative television ads regarding the city's parking and robbery problems.
Regardless of whether his points of view were right or wrong, they were very clever negative ads that calmly took aim at specific issues.
Negative campaigning should not be vicious. In the 1997 local government chief elections, the KMT attacked Sisy Chen (
Also, negative campaigning should not attack humanity.
It is wrong for the KMT to attack Chen's grandson in its ad. All grandsons are precious in the eyes of their grandparents.
KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The martial-law era has ended. It is precisely through negative campaigning that we can tear off candidates' masks so that the truth can be shown.
As for the rest, it will be judged by voters.
Cheng Tzu-leong is a professor in the advertising department at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry