To state the obvious, military/political occupations and international oversight of a country are never welcome to the people who are being occupied and/or overseen. For a while, they grin and bear it, sometimes recognizing the necessity of the loss of sovereignty that they are enduring. But their tolerance inevitably fades -- and fast.
In Bucharest recently, I was discussing the oversight role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in my country, Albania, with an expert from that body. He was surprised to learn that the number of OSCE employees in Albania is equal to that of the entire staff of the organization's Vienna headquarters. The sheer scale of the OSCE's operations in Albania is not what troubles me. What is troubling is the seeming permanence of its mission. Indeed, who is to decide when the OSCE's mission in Albania is over?
The question is, of course, broader than that of the OSCE in Albania. With UN administrators still holding sway in Kosovo and Bosnia years after their savage wars ended, and with talk of a UN mission to replace the US forces in Iraq, when should an international administration be terminated and oversight of a country returned to its citizens?
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Let there be no mistake: the OSCE played a positive role in stabilizing Albania. Its presence throughout the country in 1997 helped keep Albania united at a time of near civil war. But 1997 is a long time ago, and Albania has changed dramatically. Its democracy is secure, its economy improving.
Yet despite these far-reaching changes, the dynamics of the OSCE's presence have scarcely budged. Indeed, the organization still sticks its nose and fingers into pretty much every aspect of Albanian political life. The problem with such intrusive oversight is that political issues that incite the strongest passions -- such as determining electoral lists -- are suppressed when an international body offers and imposes its own solutions. But suppression won't make these issues go away; it only lets them fester. Albanian problems now demand homemade Albanian compromises.
For most issues, I suspect that Kosovo and Bosnia are experiencing similar side effects due to their occupations. A stultifying form of international oversight that offers only fiat or imposed conciliation paralyzes their domestic political development. Even more than in Albania, opportunities to develop the habits of compromise that make democratic politics workable are denied to the people.
In Albania, instead of developing and strengthening our infant democratic institutions, the OSCE, in its desire to see its policies implemented, often seeks to bypass or override them. This retards the country's political stabilization and democratic consolidation. Indeed, on some issues, shades of the old imperial strategy of "divide and rule" can be seen, with the OSCE pitting one Albanian institution or political party against another.
Of course, the OSCE's presence in Albania does have political backing from large portions of the country's electorate. Until 2000, the government tended more to rely on the organization's advice, but since 2001, it has tried to buttress its position by claiming that it gets along better than ever with the OSCE and its mission. When an Albanian minister tried last year to raise the question of the duration of the OSCE's mission, the opposition leapt to the organization's defense. Nonetheless, there is a creeping perception that the OSCE is becoming too deeply engaged in picking winners and losers in Albanian politics -- a perception underpinned by wider questions of sovereignty.
Is the OSCE's presence retarding the country's independence and economic vitality by creating an image of a protectorate, a country unable to forge international agreements or join powerful international bodies of its own volition? Is it the OSCE's presence, and not Albania's government, that is now keeping the country what it has long been, a hermit kingdom?
I do not attribute any malign or sinister purposes to the OSCE presence in Albania, unless one considers inertia malign. But saying that a body means well and saying that it is actually doing any good are two different things.
Worst of all, the OSCE's bureaucratic nature means that it will never have an incentive to leave because the first duty of a bureaucracy is to perpetuate itself. Of course, an effective OSCE mission, confined to Tirana and comprised of experts that the country still needs, would be useful. But Albania no longer needs the OSCE's staff to be scattered throughout the country to monitor every aspect of its political life.
The reality is that the OSCE has achieved its goals. It is time for it to take a bow and go home to Vienna. That's a lesson other occupying international agencies should keep in mind.
Sotiraq Hroni, a former Albanian diplomat, worked as an advisor to Albania's prime minister during the crisis of 1997 and was for two years an advisor to the nation's president. He founded the Institute for Democracy and Mediation, a non-governmental organization, in Tirana.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this