A year ago, Hau Lung-bin (
It has been a year since then. The slogans remain, but how many stores continue to abide by the policy? Our society has paid a price for the policy over the past year; how can we now let our efforts go down the drain?
The policy was already being challenged while Hau was still in office. Despite the EPA's determination, local agencies had neither sufficient manpower to inspect stores nor the will to enforce the policy.
A habit that was yet to be established thus soon collapsed.
The public still hasn't developed the habit of using shopping bags from home and does not mind paying NT$1 for a plastic bag when shopping. Most stores have resumed the old practice of giving away free plastic bags.
Early in December, I spotted a very interesting news story -- paper bag manufacturers solicited the EPA to restrict the use of paper bags too. This weird idea shows the failure of the policy to limit the use of plastics. Since people do not mind spending NT$1 on a plastic bag, plastics providers actually double their gains as a result of the policy, and paper bag manufacturers have born the brunt. It is truly ridiculous and sad that a ban on plastics ultimately creates more business opportunities for plastic bag manufacturers.
Around the same time last year, shopping bags were the most common souvenirs given away at government or privately-organized activities. Over the past year, how many of the so-called "environmental" shopping bags have been given away? Have we really made use of them?
The answer is no, I think.
Most of the shopping bags may have ended up in the garbage. The lucky ones perhaps function as children's schoolbags.
The even luckier ones may be used for shopping at big malls. How many shopping bags are really used in daily life to hold lunch boxes or breakfast? How many people use an almost broken plastic bag to carry their milk tea?
The misuse or lack of use of the shopping bags is a common phenomenon in our society. Major flaws have long existed in the policy.
However, all we see is the central and local governments turning a blind eye to the failure of the policy, legislators slacking off in their job of supervising the government and siding with interest groups, and the public's emphasis on convenience that outweighs their fear of the fines.
The most successful policies that have changed people's habits in recent years are the crackdown on drunk driving and riding motorcycles without wearing helmets.
Intimidated by the fines, people know that someone who rides a motorcycle without wearing a helmet is subject to a NT$500 fine. But when you ask what the fine is for stores that provide free plastic bags to customers, nobody knows.
People generally believe that few stores could possibly be fined NT$60,000, which is considered far too much.
Besides, it is difficult to catch stores in the act of giving away free plastic bags.
Many warnings were issued right after the policy was put into practice, but after a while the inspectors did not even bother to issue warnings anymore.
I'd like to ask: Has every county-level government seriously implemented the policy? If a policy is not supported with persistent enforcement, how can we expect the public to cultivate a habit?
Another thing I'd like to point out is that education has a lot to do with the failure of the policy. A good education campaign should make the public abide by it wholeheartedly.
People should not follow the rule simply because they fear the fines.
Take drunk driving, for example. The success of the policy lies in the public's awareness of the horror a drunk driver can cause, not just the fines.
People have learned from news reports that drunk driving has in many cases resulted in deaths and broken families. Government campaigns also show the results of drunk driving. That is why people cannot be more familiar with the need not to drive when under the influence of alcohol.
By comparison, how many people are aware of the overuse of plastic bags in Taiwan? How many people know what impact plastic bags have on the island's ecology?
We cannot blame the inadequacy of environmental awareness solely on the government, since Taiwan lacks a forum where public policies can be thoroughly discussed, and also lacks media that pays constant attention to policies and social values that prioritize the environment.
One year after the introduction of the policy, the media has reported that the EPA will draft guidelines to improve the policy to restrict the use of plastics more successfully.
Hopefully, after the guidelines have been proposed, they can be enforced and more effort can be put into environmental awareness at the same time.
Bryan Fang is a student in the Geography Department at National Taiwan University.
translated by Jennie Shih
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry