On Jan. 1, the Ministry of Education (MOE) published its evaluation report on Taiwan's 24 private colleges of technology that were upgraded from junior college status more than two years ago.
Over half of these colleges scored poorly in the evaluation. A total of 14 schools were graded "third-level" (meaning that they scored between 60 and 70 points on average) on the five-level evaluation.
The MOE has carried out similar evaluations since 1975. But it was actually the first time that the ministry publicized the evaluation results.
According to the Department of Technological and Vocational Education under the MOE, the scores were announced to help the public understand these colleges' characteristics and performance, as well as to put pressure on them to improve.
That the education authorities' insistence on publicizing the evaluation comes despite strong pressure from many colleges is praiseworthy.
Nevertheless, judging from the evaluation process and results, there is still room for improvement for both the MOE and the colleges.
In terms of the MOE's evaluation process, certain evaluation methods need to be changed.
First, the evaluators appointed by the MOE only conducted a one-day inspection of each of the colleges.
In fact, according to Sun Yung-ching (
Thus, they could only get a superficial impression. If the evaluators weren't able to spend more time at every college, how could they get a clear understanding of each school's facilities and development and come up with helpful evaluation results?
The MOE also said that it is only capable of conducting such evaluations once every four years due to a lack of manpower. To improve the quality of school evaluation, perhaps the MOE can hire more evaluators and establish a permanent committee to conduct evaluations annually or biannually.
Those colleges that scored well in the recent evaluation should continue striving. For example, most administrative units and academic departments of St. John's and St. Mary's Institute of Technology, and those of a few other colleges, were ranked "first-level" in the evaluation report.
Those that scored poorly should promptly improve themselves if the flaws were correctly reported. Colleges such as the Yuda Institute of Business Technology, where most units and departments lagged behind in the evaluation, effective remedies should be initiated right away.
According to MOE regulations, all schools with third-level administrative units or academic departments will be given probation for a one-year period. If they fail to overcome their weaknesses within this period, the ministry may cancel their annual subsidies or even require them to cut down the number of students.
Therefore, schools that did not do so well this time should do some serious introspection and look into their problems. They should invest students' tuition fees on school development, employ qualified personnel in professional faculties and avoid irrational manipulation of school boards, which sometimes view schools as their private property.
Hopefully, both the MOE and Taiwan's private technology colleges can learn from this evaluation experience and work to establish a desirable higher education environment.
Chang Sheng-en is a lecturer in English at Shih Chien University and the National Taipei College of Business.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations