Free people, free choices
Taiwan is a sovereign state populated by a free people and has the right to conduct referendums as part of its legal and constitutional development.
China has no right to threaten Taiwan simply because the government and the citizenry of Taiwan choose to exercise the right to conduct elections, propose and pass laws and conduct other affairs inherent in the sovereign business of a free people living in dignity.
The referendum is a simple process that will decide whether China should be asked to turn away from the threat of war and remove 500 missiles aimed at Taiwan and its people.
This peaceful nation and its citizens have invested huge sums of money, set up a large number of companies, and sent tens of thousands of its best graduates to work in China. Surely these actions are not those of just a peaceful people but of a country which encourages China's development.
These are not actions which warrant any kind of hostility.
Common sense requires that Taiwan makes known its reasons for requesting that China turn away these instruments of destruction and death and that the Chinese withdraw threats of war against its peaceful neighbor.
Such requests occur within a civil society in a process called referendum, a simple and civil act based in law by the rightful inhabitants of a state. There is no room whatsoever for any official in the US to express doubts regarding this exercise of sovereignty.
Eric Hands
Seattle, Washington
Sequester SARS researchers
SARS researchers should be sequestered. Not sequestered within Taiwan as currently proposed, but within the research facility itself.
SARS research facilities should be divided into two areas. One area would be for hands-on research. The other area would be for computer modeling, desk work, library research, administration, recreation, and so on, but without any contact with the virus.
Researchers should spend at least 10 days in the second area after working in the first before being allowed to leave the facility.
During Taiwan's recent SARS scare, such a system would have restricted exposure to a relatively small number of people already aware of the need to take full precautions at all times, resulting in huge cost savings.
Stuart Saunders
Neihu
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs