The price of complacency
In response to a Liberty Times editorial ("China is practicing state terrorism," Dec. 21, Page 8), I would like to note that if you asked me today what times I would prefer to live in, I would of course say times of general prosperity.
But often it is the times of social upheaval and war, or economic gloom and depression that makes the times of peace and prosperity possible and more vibrant as populations alive in the dark times communicate from their suffering: "I've had enough. Let's move on from here."
When times are hard, people are more willing to make the concessions that would forge a brighter day and a better future. Conversely, it is in the times of general prosperity and peace that the seeds of war, darkness, and depression are sown.
People forget what got them to the summit, or they become neglectful of real danger. The peoples of these times think: "This is what we all worked for, no one would dare try to ruin this."
They become complacent, contented, and fall sleep at the switch. You see it in the faces of the parents in the good times as they shake their heads at their wayward children. These parents think: "When I was their age, things were bad, and I was not afforded one-tenth the opportunity these children have today." So it goes that, though China is pointing a large number of missiles at it, Taiwan still exhibits complacency in the face of armed aggression.
China is a bully regime and shaming a bully has no effect. The dictators of China answer to none but their own self-interest. The one thing that would make these demigods sit up and think would be 500 offensive missiles pointed at their offices in Beijing and elsewhere.
The proper response is a buildup of strategic missiles, a tit-for-tat philosophy, as this is what bullies understand. The US is right in demanding that Taiwan do more to protect itself, as the act of a buildup of weapons and delivery systems might be all that is required to keep China from striking Taiwan, as China's dictators despise the weak and pay no respect to those that are weak.
How do we know that the concept of democracy can prompt different interpretations?
With Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Bush's position seems incredibly hypocritical as the US responded to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 by deploying missiles in Turkey and fighting the Soviet Union's violence with violence.
Being a superpower, the US supposedly would work to protect democracy around the world.
In fact, former president John F. Kennedy once declared that the US would "pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty."
Evidently, democracy can hold different meanings for different people at different times.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a