The administration of US President George W. Bush has promised to sell eight submarines to Taiwan. This promise, breaking a decades-long taboo on US-Taiwan arms sales, is of course based on an assessment by US bureaucrats of the military situation in the Taiwan Strait.
Eight to 12 submarines would create a deterrent submarine force, undoubtedly the "good thing" the Ministry of National Defense has been dreaming of. But good things never come easily, and no matter what type of submarine Taiwan might buy, the questions of the defense budget and which shipyard will build the submarines are headaches.
Therese Shaheen, the chairwoman of the American Institute in Taiwan, has said Taiwan is `silly' to spend large sums of money on submarines. This makes us think that she understands the reason that the US wants to sell these eight submarines. The defense minister and legislators should delve further into her words before reacting.
A submarine blockade of our ports is part of China's plan for an attack on Taiwan. This threat has always been overestimated. These eight submarines, plus the two currently in service, still only reach a ratio of 1:6 to the submarines of the People's Liberation Army. The use of submarines to break through a submarine blockade is merely a strategic approach without much effect.
Taiwan's building of a submarine force should be based on deterrent considerations, and provide a warning to Beijing that in the event of a blockade, we have the ability to place important Chinese ports under blockade.
Relying on the US and Japan to continue maintaining "submarine order" does not imply a loss of face, because Taiwan's international sea lanes directly affect the interests of the US and Japan.
Over the past half-century, the competition for naval strength in the waters around Taiwan has involved the US, Japan and China. The restrictive force of Taiwan's surface and air anti-submarine forces has been very limited.
The main use of the four Kidd destroyers already purchased is that their anti-aircraft firepower does not suffer the restrictions of ground-based anti-aircraft defenses and they can thus engage in war in distant waters. If equipped with the supersonic combustion ramjet (Scramjet) anti-ship missiles of the Chung Shan Institute of Science and Technology, important Chinese ports could be threatened, and the deterrent force would not be less than that offered by submarines.
Blockade warfare cannot be completed by reliance on submarines alone. Stopping and inspecting ships moving towards Taiwan requires surface ships. If the anti-air firepower of Taiwan's third-generation vessels could be universally improved, and if the 12-hour reach of the P-3C Orion anti-submarine aircraft were added, transportation lanes could be kept open with the assistance of the US and Japan.
The P-3C anti-submarine aircraft the US has promised to sell to Taiwan is in fact the military equipment Taiwan urgently needs. Carrying submarine bombs, torpedoes and Harpoon missiles, it can offer outstanding surface and submarine detection equipment, and it has more applications than a submarine. It is an anti-submarine, patrol, and long-distance bomber aircraft. In peacetime, it can be used to patrol for infiltration and illegal immigration. In wartime, it can be used for anti-ship and anti-submarine missions.
If we can get permission to build the submarines in Taiwan, that would be a different matter. Taiwan, moving toward becoming a modern ocean state, should not pass up an opportunity to transfer technology to improve its shipbuilding skills. If the submarines are purchased on this condition, the money would be well spent.
Huang Yao-ming is a board member of the Coconut Tree Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry