Ma not a libel victim
Apparently, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
For starters, libel is defined as "published material meeting three conditions: the material is defamatory either on its face or indirectly; the defamatory statement is about someone who is identifiable to one or more persons; and, the material must be distributed to someone other than the offended party."
In defining libel, we then need to look at the elements of defamation, which are defined as "(1) a publication to one other than the person defamed; (2) of a false statement of fact; (3) which is understood as being of and concerning the plaintiff; and (4) which is understood in such a way as to tend to harm the reputation of the plaintiff."
What Ma apparently has failed to see is that elements (2) and (4) are missing, and element (3) is tangential at best. Ma's big concern is that the VCD places his image next to that of a pan-blue supporter who is shouting "Long live [Chinese President] Hu Jintao"(
It's hard to see a "false statement of fact."
Additionally, can Ma really prove that his reputation was harmed in any way? Surely, in the open democracy that Ma likes to consider himself a part of, holding a different opinion is not a harm to one's reputation. Even if Ma is a staunch supporter of Hu Jintao or the PRC, where is the harm to his reputation? It's not as if the VCD was calling Ma a child pornographer or something.
Finally, does the statement in the VCD concern the plaintiff (Ma)? Ma happened to be in the VCD because it captured a public ceremony, but was the VCD really about him?
Additionally, public figures give up a certain right of privacy due to the public nature of their chosen profession. It's a sort of implied consent. A public figure, for example, can't simply sue because the news channels feature his image in a broadcast.
What's disturbing about this whole ordeal is that Ma is a former professor of law but he's clearly failed to understand the legal issues. That could be partly because Ma never really practiced law, nor did he have much legal experience. I don't think he's ever passed a bar exam in his life, and any bar membership he may have acquired was through alternative means, and not examination methods. He's a fine illustration of the saying that "those who can do, do, while those who can't teach." Better yet, they become politicians without ever spending much time in the real world.
Ryan Shih
California
VCDs are free speech
Were America not a mature democracy, American TV talk show hosts Jay Leno and David Letterman would have been persecuted when they ridiculed former president Bill Clinton every night in their shows about his womanizing scandals during his impeachment trial.
Their counterparts in Taiwan -- the group of young people who produced a satirical VCD to ridicule some of the Taiwanese politicians who are generally considered the source of Taiwan's chaos -- are not as lucky.
If these people can be sued for defamation because of their satirical VCD, then all the producers of political cartoons can be sued as well.
It is a pity that Taiwanese courts summoned those actors and producers for questioning. This is obviously a political event. The people who made the VCDs are entitled to freedom of expression, just like columnists and cartoonists. This is just common sense.
Now the pan-blue media, with the help of the courts and its political allies, are ganging up to destroy freedom of expression and persecute these young people. All people in Taiwan have a duty to speak out to deter the lunacy committed by those in the pan-blue camp.
One would question Taiwan's reputation as a vibrant democracy if the pan-blue camp and its media continue to censor Special Report and to persecute its producers and actors.
Should Taiwanese remain silent on this issue, there will be no justice for Taiwan's society. The ghost of martial law is lurking, waiting for a chance to come back.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations