Beijing has initiated a new strategy against Taiwan. China's Ministry of Commerce and the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office said China wanted to sign a pact with Taiwan similar to the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) it had signed with Hong Kong and Macau earlier this year.
Because China's attempts to interfere with Taiwan's presidential elections have failed twice over the past eight years, it has decided for now to stop using the tactics of military intimidation and propaganda. Instead, Beijing promotes "one China" and "opposing Taiwan independence" politically, while economically it encourages direct links and integration.
Such changes are only tactical adjustments. The ultimate goal remains the same; that is, China wants to annex Taiwan. So the CEPA is nothing but a new economic tactic invented by Beijing.
Basically, the CEPA deal tries to bait people by offering trade facilitation and by further opening the Chinese market. Under the CEPA, several industries in Hong Kong, including the service industry, enjoy a preferential entry into the Chinese market.
Beijing wants to use the arrangement to inject some life into Hong Kong's economy and fulfill further integration between the two economies. Once Taiwan also signs the deal, the "Chinese economic circle," or common market, would take shape.
In response to this strategy, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) agreed immediately, saying that promoting cross-strait economic cooperation and establishing a common market is also what the party is working for.
No responsible political party should have responded in such a rash manner. Although trade liberalization and facilitation is conducive to a bilateral relationship, we cannot ignore some basic facts about cross-strait relations.
Economically, after sixteen years of cross-strait engagement, China now accounts for more than 60 percent of Taiwan's outward investment. The island's trade dependence on China is more than 25 percent.
But underneath China's brilliant economic performance lies the possibility of collapse. Taiwan's economy is thus at high risk as we have put too many eggs in one basket. If our finance and service industries, as well as our overall economy, were to be drawn to China as a result of the arrangement, it is not very difficult to see whether the CEPA would be good or bad for Taiwan.
In fact, an international conference called "Cross-Strait Exchanges and National Security of Taiwan," held by Taiwan Advocates earlier this month, pointed out that economic exchanges may have brought Taiwan several benefits but the whole economy and society will suffer from unemployment and a deteriorating distribution of wealth. Fortunately, unlike Hong Kong's, Taiwan's industries have not been completely hollowed out, thanks to former president Lee Teng-hui's (
However, Taiwan has tasted the bitter outcome of cross-strait exchanges over the past few years. And Hong Kong, as if quenching its thirst with poison, is now moving its service industry further north under the CEPA. Taiwan should not make the same mistakes.
Economic affairs cannot be handled outside a political context as long as China does not give up its attempt to annex Taiwan. We also have to take China into consideration during our engagement with the US and Japan.
Since China spares no effort to prevent Taiwan from signing free-trade agreements with other countries, how likely is Beijing to sign the deal with Taiwan? An arrangement like the CEPA is nothing more than a product of the "one country, two systems" formula.
For both the CEPA and a free trade agreement, official talks will be necessary. However, during our recent experience of working with China in areas such as combating crime, exchanging weather information, performing financial management and arranging direct flights, Beijing has been deliberately nibbling away at our sovereignty by insisting on the "one China" principle and refusing official talks.
It is unlikely that Beijing will treat us on an equal basis.
Some people in Taiwan cite the example of the European common market. But European integration has come about because each member country is willing to participate in various mechanisms that are based on decisions made by parliament or that are arrived at through referendums.
Most important , no matter how big or small the country is, every member is treated equally. Documents in the EU are prepared in every country's language.
There is no such thing as a big country's vote outweighing that of a small country.
The successful integration of Europe is based on member countries' negotiating patiently on an equal basis. Therefore, only when China treats Taiwan equally and obtains Taiwan's consent can the two sides talk about a common market. It is very wrong of some people in Taiwan to advocate for a common market while attacking our own government. They simply attack the wrong target.
Lu Shih-xiang is chief executive officer of the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence and a member of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and