Beijing has initiated a new strategy against Taiwan. China's Ministry of Commerce and the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office said China wanted to sign a pact with Taiwan similar to the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) it had signed with Hong Kong and Macau earlier this year.
\nBecause China's attempts to interfere with Taiwan's presidential elections have failed twice over the past eight years, it has decided for now to stop using the tactics of military intimidation and propaganda. Instead, Beijing promotes "one China" and "opposing Taiwan independence" politically, while economically it encourages direct links and integration.
\nSuch changes are only tactical adjustments. The ultimate goal remains the same; that is, China wants to annex Taiwan. So the CEPA is nothing but a new economic tactic invented by Beijing.
\nBasically, the CEPA deal tries to bait people by offering trade facilitation and by further opening the Chinese market. Under the CEPA, several industries in Hong Kong, including the service industry, enjoy a preferential entry into the Chinese market.
\nBeijing wants to use the arrangement to inject some life into Hong Kong's economy and fulfill further integration between the two economies. Once Taiwan also signs the deal, the "Chinese economic circle," or common market, would take shape.
\nIn response to this strategy, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) agreed immediately, saying that promoting cross-strait economic cooperation and establishing a common market is also what the party is working for.
\nNo responsible political party should have responded in such a rash manner. Although trade liberalization and facilitation is conducive to a bilateral relationship, we cannot ignore some basic facts about cross-strait relations.
\nEconomically, after sixteen years of cross-strait engagement, China now accounts for more than 60 percent of Taiwan's outward investment. The island's trade dependence on China is more than 25 percent.
\nBut underneath China's brilliant economic performance lies the possibility of collapse. Taiwan's economy is thus at high risk as we have put too many eggs in one basket. If our finance and service industries, as well as our overall economy, were to be drawn to China as a result of the arrangement, it is not very difficult to see whether the CEPA would be good or bad for Taiwan.
\nIn fact, an international conference called "Cross-Strait Exchanges and National Security of Taiwan," held by Taiwan Advocates earlier this month, pointed out that economic exchanges may have brought Taiwan several benefits but the whole economy and society will suffer from unemployment and a deteriorating distribution of wealth. Fortunately, unlike Hong Kong's, Taiwan's industries have not been completely hollowed out, thanks to former president Lee Teng-hui's (
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more