Several secrets have come to light amid the tumultuous debate about the historical merits and demerits of Soong Mayling (宋美齡) following her recent death. Among those secrets are the NT$70 billion in assets allegedly owned by the National Women's League of the ROC (婦聯會), which was chaired by Soong for a long time. Its entire lack of financial transparency, however, has given rise to concern.
According to a Nov. 2 report in the Liberty Times, the Ministry of the Interior's civil affairs department, which is in charge of such matters, explained that the league was registered as a "political organization" under the Civic Organizations Law (
This situation is unthinkable in a country under the rule of law.
In contrast, social and professional organizations established under the Civic Organizations Law have their freedom of association restricted by the authorities by way of an "approval system."
The authorities have also compiled nit-picking rules covering everything from names, charters, agendas, elections and recalls, to the handling of financial matters. They sit high up in the air and instruct people on how to manage the internal affairs of an organization.
Political organizations and political parties, however, are only required to send some documents to the authorities for review. Besides, once established, they apparently do not need to undergo any supervision. It is no wonder that a "Fumin Party" (
With this unreasonable situation repeatedly coming under criticism, the interior ministry has recently submitted amendments to the Civic Organization Law to the Executive Yuan. The amended law would no longer divide organizations into three categories -- social, professional and political -- but would treat all organizations equally in terms of financial supervision. We can say that this is a direction in accord with the trend of democracy, but it may stir controversy between the ruling and opposition parties. Especially when it comes to regulations on political parties, the Executive Yuan needs to make up its mind on whether to enact a separate "political parties law." Otherwise, its attempts to resolve the matter will further entangle it, and will not necessarily resolve the chaotic situation of political organizations possessing numerous privileges.
However, before the law is amended or new ones enacted, we call on the so-called political organizations and political parties to accept public scrutiny instead of continuing to hide behind the shield of privileges.
They should know that Article 44 of the Civic Organizations Law stipulates, "Political organizations are organizations established by citizens of the Republic of China on the basis of shared democratic political concepts and with the objectives of helping shape political awareness among the citizens and promoting political participation by citizens." Article 45 adds that "the objective of recommending candidates to participate in elections for government office" is a key factor in the establishment of political parties.
Since the objectives are so lofty, most of these political organizations and political parties must have been established by clean and upstanding people. Then why don't they voluntarily disclose their expenditures and financial information to win public credibility?
Ever since martial law was lifted in Taiwan, the public has been discovering by the day that there were too many privileged nooks and crannies with hidden contrivances during the authoritarian era. An important function of democratization is to shed light on these corners. Supervision can no longer be fobbed off with the contention that "it has always been like this." What is more unfortunate is that it is human nature to love privilege. Therefore, organizations that are particularly close to power -- such as political organizations and political parties -- are frequently unwilling to let the sun shine on them. They would rather defend darkness and privileges.
In light of the women's league incident, the executive, legislative and judicial branches should quickly come up with more appropriate measures to regulate political organizations and political parties while easing the restrictions on social and professional organizations. They should also introduce autonomous power into civic non-governmental organizations and promote "social sunshine laws" so that the distribution of social resources may be more compatible with fairness and justice.
Ku Chung-hwa is a professor of sociology at National Chengchi University and an executive committee member of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry